Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

21 Feb 2023 10:19 AM IST

  • Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear today the cases related to rift in the Shiv Sena party, which led to the political changes in Maharashtra in June-July 2022.A 5-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud had on last Friday deferred the decision on the preliminary question whether to reconsider the decision in Nabam Rebia vs Deputy Speaker which held that a...

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear today the cases related to rift in the Shiv Sena party, which led to the political changes in Maharashtra in June-July 2022.

    A 5-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud had on last Friday deferred the decision on the preliminary question whether to reconsider the decision in Nabam Rebia vs Deputy Speaker which held that a Speaker cannot decide disqualification petitions when a motion seeking his removal is pending. The bench said that the question of reference cannot be decided in isolation from facts and decided to hear the matter on merits from today.

    Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.

    The following are the issues before the 5-judge bench.

    A. Whether the notice of removal of the speaker restricts him from continuing the disqualification proceedings under Schedule X of the Indian Constitution as held by the Court in Nabam Rebia;

    B. Whether a petition under Article 226 and Article 32 lies inviting a decision on a disqualification proceeding by the High Courts or the Supreme Court as the case may be;

    C. Can a court hold that a member is deemed to be disqualified by virtue of his/her actions absent a decision by the Speaker?

    D. What is the status of proceedings in the House during the pendency of disqualification petitions against the members?

    E. If the decision of speaker that a member was incurred disqualification under the Tenth Schedule relates back to the date of the complaint, then what is the status of proceedings that took place during the pendency of the disqualification petition?

    F. What is the impact of the removal of Para 3 of the Tenth Schedule? (which omitted "split" in a party as a defence against disqualification proceedings)

    G. What is the scope of the power of the Speaker to determine the whip and leader of house of the legislative party?

    H. What is the interplay with respect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule?

    I. Are intra-party questions amenable to judicial review? What is the scope of the same?

    J. Power of the governor to invite a person to form the government and whether the same is amenable to judicial review?

    H. What is the scope of the powers of Election Commission of India with respect to deter an ex parte split within a party.

    Follow this page for live-updates from the hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:16 PM IST

      Sibal: No meeting of political party took place at the instance of Eknath Shinde. That alleged meeting happened to take place on 18th July after all this was over & the petition to have symbol was filed on 19th July, the very next day.

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:15 PM IST

      Sibal: So you give legitimacy to those against whom disqualification proceedings are going on & such legitimacy which allows them to topple government with another party that is an opposition in that very state! That's the legitimacy the judicial orders have given.

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:10 PM IST

      Sibal: Can anyone say that this is not anti-party? 

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:09 PM IST

      Sibal: You can't interpret the tenth schedule in this fashion to allow the government - the elected government - to fall. That's why I said that it's the orders of the court which resulted in this.

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:09 PM IST

      Sibal: Can the tenth schedule countenance a situation where a majority or minority of MLAs just do this? Forget majority, let's say it's a minority. A minority outside the state says that I am the party.

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:09 PM IST

      Sibal: Prior to the passing of this judicial order, all that was happening was happening outside of Maharashtra, in a state in North East. By whom? Members of legislative assembly. There was no party- no meeting of the party.

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:03 PM IST

      Sibal: So now the majority of legislative party can decide who's going to be the leader- while sitting in Assam?

    • 21 Feb 2023 12:03 PM IST

      Sibal: He had to be member of legislative council. So the then CM became member of legislative council. Meanwhile someone had to be appointed as leader of house. So Eknath Shinde was the leader of house. And he was removed by decision of party.

    • 21 Feb 2023 11:59 AM IST

      Sibal: No speakers elections took place. There was a seat from legislative council- he had to use that seat. He wouldn't hold elections for six months! First you swear in someone then he resigns. This tells us how the constitution functionaries are acting off late.

    • 21 Feb 2023 11:55 AM IST

      Sibal: How can the governor swear in someone without knowing if they had majority - in the early hours of morning? 

    Next Story