Proceedings U/S 95 Of The IBC Shall Abate On Death Of The Personal Guarantor: NCLT, New Delhi

NCLT, New Delhi bench consisting of Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and Sh. Hemant Kumar Sarangi in the case of Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company v. Mr. Deepak Puri rejected an application filed by the Financial Creditor u/s 95 of the IBC, 2016 against the Personal Guarantor of the Corporate Debtor on the ground that after death of the Personal Guarantor, the proceedings against him...

Whether Claim Of License Fee For Use And Occupation Of Immovable Premises Is An Operational Debt U/S 5(21), IBC? : NCLAT Refers To Larger Bench To Consider

The Principal Bench of the NCLAT in a Bench consisting of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson, Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra and Dr. Alok Srivastava, Technical Members in Jaipur Trade Expocentre Pvt. Ltd. v. Metro Jet Airways Training Pvt. Ltd. referred the issue of whether the claim of the Licensor for payment of License Fee for use and occupation of Immovable Premises for commercial purposes is...

Suspended Board of Directors Has No Power To Replace RP Under IBC: NCLAT, Chennai

The NCLAT, Chennai in a Bench consisting of Justice M. Venugopal, Judicial Member and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member in the case of Anil Kumar Ojha v. Chandramouli Ramasubramaniam Resolution Professional of SLO Industrial Ltd. & Anr. held that the suspended Board of Directors has no power under the IBC to appoint a Resolution Professional. The power to do so has only been vested...

Retired Partner Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under IBC Against Other Partners Or Firm For Retirement Dues: NCLT, Mumbai

The NCLT, Mumbai Bench consisting of Kishore Vemulapalli, Judicial Member and Rajesh Sharma, Technical Member in the case of Anil Vora HUF v. Kavya Build-Con Private Limited rejected the Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor on the ground that a retired partner cannot initiate proceedings u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to claim retirement dues...

Personal Guarantors Of NBFC/FSC Cannot Be Proceeded Against Unless Threshold Of Rs. 500 Cr Is Satisfied: NCLT, Jaipur

The Jaipur Bench of the NCLT consisting of Deep Chandra Joshi, Judicial Member and Raghu Nayyar, Technical Member in the case of Shapoorji Pallonji Finance Private Limited v. Rekha Singh held that Personal Guarantors of Non-Banking Finance Company/ Financial Services Provider cannot be proceeded against unless the NBFC/ FSP satisfies the Rs. 500 crore threshold limit under...

Initiation of CIRP Not Mandatory For Maintainability Of An Application Against Personal Guarantors U/S 95, IBC: NCLT, Kochi

The NCLT, Kochi Bench comprising of Shyam Babu Gautam, Technical Member and Ashok Kumar Borah, Judicial Member in the case of E. Iqbal v. State Bank of India held that when an application for initiation of CIRP is pending before the NCLT, initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor is not a prerequisite for maintainability of an application u/s 95, IBC filed for initiating IRP...

IBBI Has Jurisdiction To Regulate Payment Of IRP And RP: NCLAT

The NCLAT, Principal Bench consisting of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson and V.P. Singh, Technical Member in the case of Sumit Bansal, Insolvency Professional v. Committee of Creditors of JP Engineers held that the IBBI is clothed with the jurisdiction to regulate payment of remuneration of the RP and IRP both by framing regulations or by issuing executive instructions till...

Entry In Balance Sheet Amounts To Acknowledgment Of Liability: NCLT Kochi

The NCLT, Kochi Bench consisting of Mr. Ashok Kumar Borah, Judicial Member and Mr. Anil Kumar, Technical Member in M/s Pheonix ARC Private Ltd. v. Kerala Chamber of Commerce and Industries reiterated that acknowledgement of debt in the balance sheet of the Corporate Debtor comes within the meaning of acknowledgment u/s 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and has the effect of...

In IBC Proceedings, Penalty Can Be Imposed Only Under The Code And Not Under The Companies Act: NCLAT

The NCLAT in Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson and Dr. Alok Srivastava, Technical Member in Mr. Ashish Chaturvedi v. Inox Leisure Limited held that when proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority are being carried out under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, penalty can only be imposed under the Code and not under the Companies Act, 2013. The Appeal...

90 Days Period Under Regulation 32A Of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations Directory, Not Mandatory: NCLT Hyderabad

The NCLT Hyderabad Bench consisting of Dr. N. Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath, Judicial Member and Veera Brahma Rao Arekapudi, Technical Member in Ekambareswara Rao Manne v. Mr. Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao, dismissed the application filed by the Applicant, who was a Member of the Stakeholders Consultation Committee, filed u/s 60(5) of IBC r/w Rule 11, 13 & 32 of the NCLT Rules...

If Excluding Time From CIRP Helps The Corporate Debtor To Revive Its Operations, Such Exclusion Must Be Allowed: NCLAT

The NCLAT Single Bench consisting of Justice M. Venugopal, Judicial Member in the case of Vinod Tarachand Agarwal held that if exclusion of time of CIRP helps to revive the operations of the Corporate Debtor and thus achieve the objective of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, such exclusion must be allowed. The Appellant filed an appeal against the order of the NCLT, Ahmedabad...

Google Gets A Cut Of 8% Withholding Tax On Its Remittance

The Delhi High Court Bench, comprising of Justices Manmohan and Naveen Chawla, have directed Google Cloud India Private Ltd. (GIC) to withhold only 8% tax while making payment to Google Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, a Singapore based subsidiary of Google LLC. The court reaffirmed that the said order was only an interim measure and it should not be treated as a non-compliance with the impugned...