Labour & Service

Compulsory Retirement Order Not Punitive Or Stigmatic, So No Hearing Of Employee Needed : Supreme Court
The Court further held that an order of compulsory retirement cannot be challenged by contending that another similarly placed officer was not subjected to same action.

Sikkim High Court Dismisses Lawyers' Plea Challenging COI Requirement For Judicial Service Recruitment, Leaves Constitutional Validity Open
The Sikkim High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by practising advocates challenging the eligibility conditions prescribed for recruitment to five entry-level posts in the Sikkim Judicial Service, including the requirement of possessing a Certificate of Identification (COI) and a valid Local Employment Card.Chief Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque held that: “This writ petition was filed...

Jharkhand High Court Sets Aside JSSC Recruitment Cancellation Following Protests, Appointees' Services To Depend On Final Outcome Of Litigation
The Jharkhand HC has quashed the State Government's notification dated August 18, 2026, cancelling the recruitment conducted by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) pursuant to Advertisement No. 10 of 2023. The Court held that the State's decision was contrary to earlier orders of the High Court and Supreme Court concerning the same recruitment process. However, it clarified that...

Meghalaya High Court Gives State 4 Months To Process Terminal Benefits For Widow Of Employee Who Died Without Receiving Dues
The Meghalaya High Court has directed the State Government to process the release of terminal benefits to the widow of a deceased Public Health Engineering Department employee, who died in 2020 without receiving his retirement dues. The Court observed that although the employee's superannuation on January 31, 2016, had been acknowledged by the State, there was no material to establish that...

Tripura High Court Directs NIT Agartala To Pay Over ₹85 Lakh Towards Pension, Leave Salary And Gratuity To Former Employee
The Tripura High Court has directed the National Institute of Technology (NIT), Agartala, to pay over ₹85 lakh towards pro-rata pension contribution, leave salary contribution and gratuity to a former employee, holding that the Institute could not deny him service benefits contrary to its own memorandums recognising his past service.Justice Biswajit Palit remarked that: “Whatever benefit...

Placement Agency Hiring No Ground To Deny Minimum Pay Scale To Class-IV Employees: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has held that employees engaged through placement agencies, working on various Class-IV posts, are entitled to get benefit of minimum of the pay-scale applicable to Class-IV employees of the government. The bench of Justice Kuldeep Mathur relied upon an order passed by a coordinate bench in Dhariya v State of Rajasthan, where in relation to similarly situated...

Voluntary Discharge From Service Entails Forfeiture Of Past Service, Pension Benefit Cannot Be Invoked: Meghalaya High Court
The Meghalaya High Court has dismissed a pension claim filed by a former Assam Rifles Rifleman who was discharged from service on his own request after rendering over 13 years of service, holding that voluntary resignation entails forfeiture of past service under Rule 26(1) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Court clarified that an employee cannot invoke Rule 49(2),...

Intervening Termination Won't Disentitle Employees From Regularisation If They Complete 10 Years' Service: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed the special appeal filed by the State against a single judge's order directing regularization of the respondents, opining that an abrupt termination of the respondents by the appellants in the past was a mechanism adopted by the department to deprive employees from the fruits of regularization. The division bench of Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur and...

Woman Rejected For UP Constable Post Over Squint Eye; Supreme Court Directs Appointment After Medical Board Finds Vision Normal
The Supreme Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh govt. to issue an appointment order to a woman candidate for the post of Constable Civil Police, who was denied appointment on the ground of an alleged squint eye, despite a medical certificate certifying her vision as proper and normal. The appellant was issued a call letter for Document Verification (DV) and Physical Standard Test (PST)...

Teachers Of UP Sports Colleges Society Not 'Public Servants', Can't Approach State Public Services Tribunal: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has held that teachers in the sports colleges run by the U.P. Sports Colleges Society are not “public servants” under Section 2(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunals) Act, 1976, and that their claim petitions are not maintainable before the U.P. State Public Service Tribunal.Section 2(b) of the Act, 1976 covers a person in the service or pay of the...

Supreme Court Upholds Rule On Pension Deduction From Salary Of Retired Govt Servants Appointed To Uttarakhand PSC
The Court held that the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' did not apply in the instant case.

Employee Performing Duties Of Higher Post Is Entitled To Promotion From Date Of Formal Assignment Of Charge: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
A Division Bench of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court comprising Chief Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Rajesh Sekhri held that performing higher-post duties with charge allowance entitles the employee to substantive promotion from the date when such charge was formally assigned. Background Facts The employee was a daily wager in the Municipal Committee. He was...
