Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

21 Feb 2023 4:49 AM GMT

  • Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear today the cases related to rift in the Shiv Sena party, which led to the political changes in Maharashtra in June-July 2022.A 5-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud had on last Friday deferred the decision on the preliminary question whether to reconsider the decision in Nabam Rebia vs Deputy Speaker which held that a...

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear today the cases related to rift in the Shiv Sena party, which led to the political changes in Maharashtra in June-July 2022.

    A 5-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud had on last Friday deferred the decision on the preliminary question whether to reconsider the decision in Nabam Rebia vs Deputy Speaker which held that a Speaker cannot decide disqualification petitions when a motion seeking his removal is pending. The bench said that the question of reference cannot be decided in isolation from facts and decided to hear the matter on merits from today.

    Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.

    The following are the issues before the 5-judge bench.

    A. Whether the notice of removal of the speaker restricts him from continuing the disqualification proceedings under Schedule X of the Indian Constitution as held by the Court in Nabam Rebia;

    B. Whether a petition under Article 226 and Article 32 lies inviting a decision on a disqualification proceeding by the High Courts or the Supreme Court as the case may be;

    C. Can a court hold that a member is deemed to be disqualified by virtue of his/her actions absent a decision by the Speaker?

    D. What is the status of proceedings in the House during the pendency of disqualification petitions against the members?

    E. If the decision of speaker that a member was incurred disqualification under the Tenth Schedule relates back to the date of the complaint, then what is the status of proceedings that took place during the pendency of the disqualification petition?

    F. What is the impact of the removal of Para 3 of the Tenth Schedule? (which omitted "split" in a party as a defence against disqualification proceedings)

    G. What is the scope of the power of the Speaker to determine the whip and leader of house of the legislative party?

    H. What is the interplay with respect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule?

    I. Are intra-party questions amenable to judicial review? What is the scope of the same?

    J. Power of the governor to invite a person to form the government and whether the same is amenable to judicial review?

    H. What is the scope of the powers of Election Commission of India with respect to deter an ex parte split within a party.

    Follow this page for live-updates from the hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 21 Feb 2023 7:14 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Assuming you're right in everything you argued, what is the net conclusion?

      Sibal: What is the speaker to decide?

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Power to disqualify is with court?

      Sibal: They decided in Rana.

    • 21 Feb 2023 7:08 AM GMT

      Sibal: Tenth schedule cannot be subverted by members of legislative party saying that there is a split in the party.

    • 21 Feb 2023 7:08 AM GMT

      Justice Narasimha: So what you're arguing is that the issue relating to tenth schedule must be done later and what is to be decided is the status of members outside the party.

    • 21 Feb 2023 7:05 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: According to you, the speaker could not have been thwarted and trust vote could not have been taken place.

      Sibal: And the governor could not have sworn in.

    • 21 Feb 2023 7:04 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: It seems that apart from the 39, who were disqualified, other members of your legislative party also voted for Mr Narwekar. Mr Narwekar holds 122- after excluding the 39 and independents.

    • 21 Feb 2023 6:56 AM GMT

      Sr Adv NK Kaul: The effective strength comes down to 249. Effective votes received were 125, which were over 50% than votes required. Even if there were 39 disqualifications, Mr Narwekar was proved.

    • 21 Feb 2023 6:54 AM GMT

      Sibal: If your lordships decide against me, it would be permitting toppling of elected governments.

    • 21 Feb 2023 6:54 AM GMT

      Sibal: The question is very limited- Should the courts would have given time? What was the result of that? There was an elected government in power. Tenth schedule was used to topple the government.

    • 21 Feb 2023 6:51 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Ultimately you don't face the trust vote?

      Sibal: I don't, we've challenged the trust vote also.

    • 21 Feb 2023 6:49 AM GMT

      Sibal: If they're members of Shivsena, how can they disable the whip and vote for a BJP candidate against Shivsena? There's no evidence required here.

    Next Story