'CBI Probe In WB Coal Mining Scam': Supreme Court To Examine Whether Order Of Calcutta HC Single Bench In Criminal Matter Appealable Before DB, Issues Notice

Supreme Court has on Monday sought response of the Central Bureau of Investigation in the plea filed challenging order of the Calcutta High Court whereby it allowed CBI to investigate a case pertaining to illegal mining and transportation of coal through Railways in West Bengal, without the State's consent. A division Bench of Justices Chandrachud and MR Shah has also issued notice to the Union of India and Superintendent of Police Anti- Corruption Branch along with CBI. The court however denied to grant interim protection from coercive steps to the petitioner.Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for petitioner submitted before the Court that appeal before Division Bench were not eligible, and order wasn't appealable. Therefore the order passed is without jurisdiction."That is actually a grievance of the criminal lawyers. We have to come to your lordships every time", Submitted Senior Advocate Siddharth Dave.On the Bench's inquiry whether the Order of single Judge was stayed, Rohatgi answered in the affirmative. He stated that their order was that CBI can do it only in Railway area, but railway area has not been defined.Justice Shah: What was nature of proceedings before Single Judge.Rohatgi: It was for quashing of FIRDr AM Singhvi appearing for state of West Bengal submitted that he supports the petitioner on the issue of law. He added that there is admittedly no consent for CBI investigation, and two years after withdrawal this plea has been filed. Railways being central subject, CBI will have jurisdiction.Bench observes that in this case both parties are aggrieved.Rohatgi submitted that the petitioner's SLP is competent against the order passed in CBI's appeal where CBI was granted a relief by the Letters Patent Bench. Therefore he clarified that the petitioner is challenging the order where CBI's appeal has been allowed, and the appeal would lie as far as relief to CBI is concerned.The Bench observed that notice needs to be issued to CBI and the parties need to be heard."We will also have to consider the Appellate side rules of Calcutta High Court." Justice Shah stated."What is the HC's appellate rule for Calcutta?" Justice Chandrachud asked."No such rule that empowers appeal of criminal jurisdiction" Mukul Rohatgi answered.Court observes that Sr Adv Rohatgi submitted that Order of single judge was not amenable for an intra court appeal in terms of letters patent of the High Court's position as has been clarified in various judgements of the Court.Rohatgi also urged theCourt to grant petitioner protection from coercive steps claiming that it is a constitutional issue. He submitted that the petitioner has allegations for involvement in illegal coal mining. He argued that the allegations are politically motivated and issues will have to be gone into.Bench: Nothing will happen to you in this timeRohatgi: They'll arrest me tomorrow,I've been summoned by ED.I'm only seeking protection against coercive steps for two weeks.The Bench however decided to not grant interim protection and hear the matter next Monday instead to hear both sides and pass orders.A special leave petition has been filed before the Supreme Court against an order of the Calcutta High Court which allowed CBI to investigate a case pertaining to illegal mining and transportation of coal through Railways in West Bengal, without the State's consent. It is the case of the Petitioner, Anup Majee, that the general consent given by the State of West Bengal to CBI under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 on August 2, 1989, was withdrawn vide a subsequent Notification dated November 16, 2018. Thus, he argued that in view of the withdrawal of such consent by the State, the CBI had no authority to register an FIR or conduct investigation in the instant case. The plea filed through Advocate Jaikriti S. Jadeja states, "extension of powers and jurisdiction of the CBI to any area (including Railway areas) in a State, as granted by the Central Government under Section 5 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, is subject to the consent of the concerned State Government as mandated under Section 6 of the DSPE Act." Background The case pertains to illegal mining and transportation of coal through Railways in connivance with officers of the Eastern Coalfield Limited, Railways, C.I.S.F. and some other private persons including the writ petitioner (Anup Majee). A FIR was registered in the matter by CBI for offences of criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust by public servants and criminal misconduct by public servants by dishonestly or fraudulently misappropriating the property entrusted to them or any property under their control as public servants or allowing other persons to do so. The Petitioner had impugned the FIR before a Single Bench of the Calcutta High Court which held that authority of the CBI to investigate into the allegations in a particular case...

'CBI Probe In WB Coal Mining Scam': Supreme Court To Examine Whether Order Of Calcutta HC Single Bench In Criminal Matter Appealable Before DB, Issues Notice

Srishti Ojha

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

'CBI Probe In WB Coal Mining Scam': Supreme Court To Examine Whether Order Of Calcutta HC Single Bench In Criminal Matter Appealable Before DB, Issues Notice

Srishti Ojha

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers