Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi- LIVE UPDATES From Supreme Court

Live Law News Network

8 Dec 2021 10:44 AM IST

  • Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafris Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi- LIVE UPDATES From Supreme Court

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheswari and CT Ravikumar will hear the matter today.Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal will continue his arguments today on behalf of Zakia...

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.

    A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheswari and CT Ravikumar will hear the matter today.

    Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal will continue his arguments today on behalf of Zakia Jafri.

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard the closing arguments of the Solicitor General, Mr. Tushar Mehta. At the outset, the Solicitor General was critical of the motivations of Teesta Setalvad (Petitioner No. 2) in the present proceedings, which he argued was to simply malign the State of Gujarat. Apart from that, Mr. Solicitor General, vehemently argued that the State had taken all measures that it possibly could, after the Sabarmati Express was torched and during the ensuing riots. To substantiate his claim, he relied on the Report of the Commission of Enquiries set up by the State with respect to the 2002 riots. In his rebuttal, Mr. Kapil Sibal fervently reiterated his submissions on the lack of investigation by SIT.

    Stay On This Page For Live Updates From The Hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:56 PM IST

      Sibal: Dismissal of a private compliant or discharge of accused is not acquittal. We are at a stage prior to that. Even cognisance has not been taken. I do not understand their argument of acquittal.

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:51 PM IST

      Sibal: Finality of criminal proceeding can come pursuant to a trial. The argument was made by SIT that if an accused is acquitted what will happen to him. They can be tried. Kindly see S.300 of CrPC.

      Mr. Sibal reads out S.300.

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:50 PM IST

      Sibal: This is an order of the Guj HC. [pointing out the inadequacies of the investigation]

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:49 PM IST

      Sibal: Under A. 20 you cannot be prosecuted if convicted, but if acquitted you can be. Not on same evidence, but other evidence can come to light.

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:40 PM IST

      Sibal: A closure report is a closure report, it is not proof of fact, it is an opinion. They read to your lordships the 161 statements and said that this is the conclusion. This cannot be done, your lordship.

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:38 PM IST

      Sibal: All these findings given by Mag on the basis of 161 statements is wholly inconsistent with the law.

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:37 PM IST

      Sibal: The Mag. has given finding of facts based on 161 statements. I will give your lordship the pages.

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:36 PM IST

      Sibal: 'Full papers of investigation are not provided to us' [SPP] Now on SIT. 'Documents as old as 2009 was given to me when I was examining the witness'. SPP resigned and the judge was transferred. Members of prosecutors appointed by SIT was saying this.

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:36 PM IST

      Sibal: pg 74 Milords. [Refers to a letter written by Special Public Prosecutor in the Gulberg matter alleging the judge to be hostile, after which the TC judge was transferred].

    • 8 Dec 2021 2:35 PM IST

      Sibal: Nothing prevented the State to investigate from 2003 to 2008. But they did not do it. Thus, what the State says, that they have done what could be done, is contrary to record.

    Next Story