Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

25 Nov 2021 10:37 AM IST

  • Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafris Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi- LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar is hearing the matter.On Wednesday, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, appearing on behalf of SIT, emphatically submitted that...

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.

    A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar is hearing the matter.

    On Wednesday, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, appearing on behalf of SIT, emphatically submitted that the SIT had conducted an impeccable investigation and on certain occasions went beyond their means to meet the ends of justice. Over a course of seven days, a Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar had heard the detailed submissions of Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal demonstrating the failure of SIT in investigating the matter.

    Stay On This Page For Live Updates


    Live Updates

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:29 PM IST

      Rohatgi: Yet, the SIT took it more seriously than what the SC had said. Are saying that everyone was mixed up and only three officers were saying the truth.

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:29 PM IST

      Rohatgi: In the complaint there are 63 accused, apart from the doctoring business. In Protest many more are accused. They take officer of a particular rank and all successive officers appointed to that rank are made accused.

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:29 PM IST

      Rohatgi: That phase not used.

      Bench: SIT was to enquire about continuing conspiracy?

      Rohatgi: The SC said SIT please examine the complaint because she might have further material relatable to Gulberg. SC does not talk about conspiracy.

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:28 PM IST

      Bench: These elections were held in which month?

      Rohatgi: In Dec.

      Bench: Is the allegation that it was continuous conspiracy? Is it mentioned in complaint?

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:24 PM IST

      Rohatgi: [addresses the allegation pertaining to elections] Preponing or postponing election how was it related to further material in Gulberg. The guiding light is the order of SC which said SIT please look into the complaint for further material relatable to Gulberg.

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:16 PM IST

      Rohatgi: Allegation No. 16. It is about transfer of officers at grassroot level. Milord, kindly note, the major part of the complaint was taking from the affidavits of the the officers (including Shreekumar). She did not have personal knowledge of this. 

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:16 PM IST

      Rohatgi: The conclusion is that there is no delay. This by itself destroys all allegation of conspiracy by higher officials. If the idea was to conspire, the army would not have been called within 3 hours of the riots.

      Rohatgi: Then the allegation on PPs. Every gentleman who are PPs have been examined by SIT. In this one, your lordship, will not find Arvind Pandeya. He was not mentioned in the complaint. As I had informed yesterday, he was only a PP of State Govt. before the Commission.

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:16 PM IST

      Rohatgi: Then allegation is a press statement. Then allegation No. 30. No direction against bandh.

      Rohatgi: Then allegation is delay in requisition of army. No need to read, this has come again and again.


    • 25 Nov 2021 12:04 PM IST

      Rohatgi: Then allegation is press statement. Then allegation No. 30. No direction against bandh.

    • 25 Nov 2021 12:04 PM IST

      Rohatgi: Allegation of delay in deploying army. Army was airlifted, how do they say delay. Centre and neighbouring state were asked to provide force. There was no material to hold that there was any truth in the allegation.

    Next Story