Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 4]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

9 Aug 2023 5:38 AM GMT

  • Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 4]

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue its hearing today in the petitions challenging the decision of the Central Government to scrap the special status of Jammu and Kashmir by diluting Article 370 of the Constitution.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant will hear...

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue its hearing today in the petitions challenging the decision of the Central Government to scrap the special status of Jammu and Kashmir by diluting Article 370 of the Constitution.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant will hear the matter. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal argued for the first three days. Senior Advocate Gopal Subramanian is expected to commence his arguments today.


    Live Updates

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:19 AM GMT

      Subramanium: Just as the Constituent Assembly debates of India are inspiring, the Constituent Assembly debates of J&K are also inspiring. It was really on basis of Rousseau's model of representative democracy that the Constituent Assembly was formed.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:18 AM GMT

      Subramanium: I will take you to some portions of the debates at Constituent Assembly of J&K. Then you will notice what their final resolution was. The text of that resolution is the answer to the case.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:17 AM GMT

      Subramanium: The controversy is based on one misunderstanding - there is a unilateral exercise of power possible by the president under Art 370. This is how we've looked at it. Now I'll show that it's exactly the converse.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:16 AM GMT

      Subramanium: That is the reason why draft article 306A spoke about the Constituent Assembly of J&K taking a decision.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:15 AM GMT

      Subramanium: What the Indian Constituent Assembly did is that just as they felt that a decision can only be taken by the people, they thought that it was appropriate and necessary that the will of people is ascertained.

      Subramanium: They maintained the highest sense of democracy and respect.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:14 AM GMT

      Subramanium: J&K was not like any other state at the time of accession. I'll give you three reasons- J&K had its own constitution prior to accession; the accession was qualified because people were still in the process of making up their mind.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:12 AM GMT

      Subramanium: Dr Ambedkar introduced the Constitution. His introductory speech had two themes. He speaks about the Indian Constitution being federal. He also says that people who live in a state can be given special rights, privileges.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:11 AM GMT

      Subramanium: Our constitution recognises asymmetric federalism. The purpose of asymmetry is to take note of special conditions and special needs of people.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:10 AM GMT

      Subramanium: I will urge your lordships to apply the "degree test" or the "effect test" applied by Chief Justice Kapadia in a case called Glanrock. It is by applying that test we assess the extent of abrogation.

      [He is referring to Glanrock Estate v State of TN, 2010]

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:06 AM GMT

      Subramanium: I will submit that the basic structure which your lordships have to discern will be deduced both from the Indian and the J&K constitution.

    Next Story