Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 4]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

9 Aug 2023 5:38 AM GMT

  • Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 4]

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue its hearing today in the petitions challenging the decision of the Central Government to scrap the special status of Jammu and Kashmir by diluting Article 370 of the Constitution.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant will hear...

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue its hearing today in the petitions challenging the decision of the Central Government to scrap the special status of Jammu and Kashmir by diluting Article 370 of the Constitution.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant will hear the matter. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal argued for the first three days. Senior Advocate Gopal Subramanian is expected to commence his arguments today.


    Live Updates

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:33 AM GMT

      Subramanium: And what did we under 370 offer? We offered the ability to frame a Constitution and the ability to offer our Constitution subject to special exceptions.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:32 AM GMT

      Subramanium: The dual obligation is to be discovered in the words of S 147 of J&K Constitution and second are words in Art 370 itself. In S 147, one law which couldn't be touched was the provisions of Constitution of India as applied to J&K.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:30 AM GMT

      Subramanian: The two Constitutions speak to each other. From which provision? Article 370. Art 370 was not a repository of untrammeled power, but a medium through the Indian Constitution would apply. Here lies what I call dual obligation.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:29 AM GMT

      Subramanium: Even though the word temporary appears in marginal notes, the resolution was that Constitution of India must apply with these modifications. But more importantly, Article 1 and 370 must continue. I am talking of an affirmative resolution. It's not non formalistic.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:28 AM GMT

      Subramanium: They also had seperate provisions including the autonomy in respect of framing of laws. This is the way two constituent assemblies as a product of their energies through now the Constitution speak to each other.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:25 AM GMT

      Subramanium: The Government of India accepted that request and issued the 1954 Order. And then they said if we have already got a order subject to exceptions and modifications and in that they omitted many parts of our constitution because they wanted it to come in their Consti.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:24 AM GMT

      Subramanium: They said that we will frame our constitution but we will request the GOI that its constitution will be exceptions which we need for J&K must be brought into effect under Art 370. That's why we have 3 Constitution Orders- of 1950, 1952, and 1954.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:23 AM GMT

      Subramanium: One of the first States in India which looked at land reforms was Kashmir. It was actually their throbbing concern at that time that we must give rights over land to people and they must be permanent residents.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:22 AM GMT

      Subramanium: Second, they were looking at all the Constitutions of the world, just like Dr Ambedkar was. They had many constitutions to look at. They also looked at Indian Constitution and they said that we need some special provisions for us.

    • 9 Aug 2023 6:21 AM GMT

      Subramanium: More importantly, they took their decisions in three steps- they left India in no manner of doubt that they have faith and respect for people of India and are acceding to India.

    Next Story