Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case [March 14]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

14 March 2023 5:53 AM GMT

  • Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case [March 14]

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases related to rift in Shiv Sena.A bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud will hear the matter. Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.The bench started hearing the matter on merits from February 21. On February 16, it had decided to defer a decision on the...

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases related to rift in Shiv Sena.

    A bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud will hear the matter. Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.

    The bench started hearing the matter on merits from February 21. On February 16, it had decided to defer a decision on the preliminary issue of larger bench reference by choosing to determine it along with the merits of the case.

    Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal completed his submissions for the Uddhav side over three days. Senior Advocate Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi commenced his arguments for Uddhav side on February 23. Reports of the previous hearings can be read here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.

    Follow this page for live-updates


    Live Updates

    • 14 March 2023 7:05 AM GMT

      Kaul: Governor will only look at the evidence in front of him. He can't be asked to conduct an inquiry with the same rigour as the election commission...When overwhelming nos of MLAs withdraw support, what is he to do but act on the material.

    • 14 March 2023 7:04 AM GMT

      Kaul: If material is available before governor to reach an informed decision like this, what is wrong with it?

      Kohli J: What about excess use of power?

      Kaul: That should be seen in every case.

    • 14 March 2023 7:04 AM GMT

      Kohli J: How many times has this power been properly exercised in recent examples?

      Kaul: I'll find out. But, let us assume that no such case. So what? If a governor is within their powers & no prohibition, governor not bound by precedents.

    • 14 March 2023 7:03 AM GMT

      Kaul: If a governor is satisfied that a govt has lost confidence of the house, it is the duty of the governor to call a floor test.

    • 14 March 2023 6:59 AM GMT

      Kaul: There are three fundamental principles, governor cannot do a head count in Raj Bhavan, prima facie view to be taken on cogent material, & floor test at the earliest possible instance, because it is the litmus test of democracy.

    • 14 March 2023 6:56 AM GMT

      Kaul: ...There may be rarest of rare cases where court has to intervene. But that is not to say this court should start deciding these matters. The court cannot act as a court of first instance with respect to disqualification of MLA/MP.

    • 14 March 2023 6:55 AM GMT

      Shah J: Your submission is that only in exceptional cases (such as in Rana), court may interfere at the stage of disqualification. In other cases, this must be left to the speaker.

      Kaul: That is what the Constitution provides for. 

    • 14 March 2023 6:52 AM GMT

      Kaul: In Keisham Singh itself, Nariman J had said a time limit should be fixed. Therefore, this very pertinent question of timeline does stand answered by this decision.

    • 14 March 2023 6:51 AM GMT

      Kaul: At the same time, Your Lordships very pertinently asked whether speaker can then hold on to this decision indefinitely. This is what Nariman J had also discussed in Keisham Singh while interpreting Rajendra Singh Rana...

    • 14 March 2023 6:51 AM GMT

      Kaul: ...While disqualification petition is pending, the legislator should be allowed to participate & vote. Otherwise, there would be a danger to bedrock of democracy. A minority govt would be allowed to continue indefinitely. 

    Next Story