Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case [Feb 28]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

28 Feb 2023 4:46 AM GMT

  • Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case [Feb 28]

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases related to rift in Shiv Sena.A bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud will hear the matter. Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.The bench started hearing the matter on merits from February 21. On February 16, it had decided to defer a decision on the...

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases related to rift in Shiv Sena.

    A bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud will hear the matter.  Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.

    The bench started hearing the matter on merits from February 21. On February 16, it had decided to defer a decision on the preliminary issue of larger bench reference by choosing to determine it along with the merits of the case.

    Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal completed his submissions for the Uddhav side over three days. Senior Advocate Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi commenced his arguments for Uddhav side on February 23. Reports of the previous hearings can be read here, here, here, here, here and here.

    Follow this page for live-updates from today's hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:27 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Bommai is different.

      Kaul: Bommai doesn't just restrict itself to the facts but says that the moment the support for Ministry is withdrawn, the only option left to the governor is to conduct a floor test. 

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:13 AM GMT

      Senior Advocate Kaul reads from the judgement in SR Bommai v. Union of India.

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:11 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: First let's see Bommai. Because anything with more than 5 (judges) is like gospel to us.

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:11 AM GMT

      Justice MR Shah: Their submission is that if ultimately speaker takes a decision they're disqualified, they're disqualified from day 1. So they say that it is better if disqualification proceedings are decided first. You have to answer that also.

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:11 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Problem arises where the reason of the trust vote is so intrinsically connected with the disqualification proceedings.

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:11 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: This is not a case where 3-4 parties have formed a coalition. Two parties say they're pulling out. Governor can say that you've pulled out so show us you have the allegiance of the house.

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:10 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Why is the trust vote required to be held? Because these 7 independents and 34- they start clamouring. The point is if that is the reason of the unsettling of government of the house, antecedent basis of that is disqualification.

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:05 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: We have to be cognizant of the situation where the reason why he/she can perform functions of legislatures is because the speaker is not qualified to decide on disqualification issue?

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:04 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: The need for a floor test arises because a group of legislatures may be disqualified because of a split in party. If the legitimacy of the split is itself in question, then holding of a floor test- are you not putting a premium on disqualification proceedings?

    • 28 Feb 2023 9:04 AM GMT

      Justice Narasimha: Your submissions are that proceedings under tenth schedule operate independent of government.

      Kaul: I bow down. Additionally, an MLA is fully entitled to vote during pendency of disqualification. Then what is the hindrance to floor test

    Next Story