Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing | Shiv Sena Case [March 2]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

2 March 2023 6:43 AM GMT

Share this

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases related to rift in Shiv Sena.A bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud will hear the matter. Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.The bench started hearing the matter on merits from February 21. On February 16, it had decided to defer a decision on the...

Live Updates

2 March 2023 6:52 AM GMT
Kaul: My case is not that majority cannot be incurred in 2(1)(a). My case is that the speaker has to decide it. That you want to bypass the constitutional functionary and come to Supreme Court. My case was on Nabam which is entirely different.
2 March 2023 6:52 AM GMT
Kaul: My case is that legislature party and the political party go hand in hand and you are seeking an artificial distinction between the two.
2 March 2023 6:51 AM GMT
Kaul: In a much worse case (Yediyurappa), the court held that 2(1)(a) was not attracted. If it is, internal dissent which is the bedrock of democracy will be thrown out.
2 March 2023 6:51 AM GMT
Senior Advocate NK Kaul: I will distinguish between other judgements and this case. There is an artificial distinction sought to be created between the legislative and political party. This isn't our case.

Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing | Shiv Sena Case [March 2]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Live Updates

Kaul: My case is not that majority cannot be incurred in 2(1)(a). My case is that the speaker has to decide it. That you want to bypass the constitutional functionary and come to Supreme Court. My case was on Nabam which is entirely different.

Kaul: My case is that legislature party and the political party go hand in hand and you are seeking an artificial distinction between the two.

Kaul: In a much worse case (Yediyurappa), the court held that 2(1)(a) was not attracted. If it is, internal dissent which is the bedrock of democracy will be thrown out.

Senior Advocate NK Kaul: I will distinguish between other judgements and this case. There is an artificial distinction sought to be created between the legislative and political party. This isn't our case.

Tags