Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing(Day 3)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

15 Feb 2022 2:10 PM IST

Live Updates

15 Feb 2022 4:34 PM IST
Kumar: There is no prohibition in wearing the Hijab even in the GO.
15 Feb 2022 4:31 PM IST
Kumar : Kindly mark this Govt is yet to take a decision on the uniform dress code. It is to constitute a high-level committee. As of now Govt has not prescribed any uniform or prohibited the wearing of hijab.
15 Feb 2022 4:29 PM IST
Kumar refers to the statement of objections - Kindly mark this, they says "code of conduct of institution". There is no code of conduct.
15 Feb 2022 4:28 PM IST
Kumar : I was prevented from entering the school from Dec 28. So their banking upon a decision taken on Dec 31.
15 Feb 2022 4:25 PM IST
Sr Adv Professor Ravivarma Kumar begins submissions.
CJ : Let us first understand the status of the petitioner. She has filed another writ petition and has filed a withdrawal memo in the other petition.
Kumar : Yes.
CJ : In that case, will allow the withdrawal of other.
15 Feb 2022 4:24 PM IST
CJ : Mr Sanjay Hegde has already made his argument in 2146. We will not hear anyone else.
Mir says Hegde made only preliminary submissions.
CJ : Please don't waste the time of the court. We will hear the other counsels.
15 Feb 2022 4:23 PM IST
CJ: You people cannot decide who is to argue first. Let us make one thing clear, we will hear only one counsel in one case.
15 Feb 2022 4:22 PM IST
Adv TaHir: Mr Hegde has argued only made submission on preliminary reliefs.
CJ : Sorry, this we will not allow. Mr.Hegde has made his submissions. We have noted.
15 Feb 2022 4:21 PM IST
Adv Tahir submits that a withdrawal memo has been filed in WP 2146/2022
AG : The point is, the arguments on behalf of Resham have been addressed. Same petitioner cannot urge the same questions of law on the same facts through different counsel.
15 Feb 2022 4:19 PM IST
Advocate General intervenes : The petition of Ravivarma Kumar is filed by one Ms Resham. This very petitioner has filed WP 2146/2022 in which Mr Hegde argued.
CJ : She has filed two petitions?
AG : Yes, she is one of the petitioners in another case. They have to justify.

Next Updates Previous Updates

Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing(Day 3)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Live Updates

Kumar: There is no prohibition in wearing the Hijab even in the GO.

Kumar : Kindly mark this Govt is yet to take a decision on the uniform dress code. It is to constitute a high-level committee. As of now Govt has not prescribed any uniform or prohibited the wearing of hijab.

Kumar refers to the statement of objections - Kindly mark this, they says "code of conduct of institution". There is no code of conduct.

Kumar : I was prevented from entering the school from Dec 28. So their banking upon a decision taken on Dec 31.

Sr Adv Professor Ravivarma Kumar begins submissions.CJ : Let us first understand the status of the petitioner. She has filed another writ petition and has filed a withdrawal memo in the other petition.Kumar : Yes.CJ : In that case, will allow the withdrawal of other.

CJ : Mr Sanjay Hegde has already made his argument in 2146. We will not hear anyone else.Mir says Hegde made only preliminary submissions.CJ : Please don't waste the time of the court. We will hear the other counsels.

CJ: You people cannot decide who is to argue first. Let us make one thing clear, we will hear only one counsel in one case.

Adv TaHir: Mr Hegde has argued only made submission on preliminary reliefs.CJ : Sorry, this we will not allow. Mr.Hegde has made his submissions. We have noted.

Adv Tahir submits that a withdrawal memo has been filed in WP 2146/2022AG : The point is, the arguments on behalf of Resham have been addressed. Same petitioner cannot urge the same questions of law on the same facts through different counsel.

Advocate General intervenes : The petition of Ravivarma Kumar is filed by one Ms Resham. This very petitioner has filed WP 2146/2022 in which Mr Hegde argued.CJ : She has filed two petitions?AG : Yes, she is one of the petitioners in another case. They have to justify.

Tags

Sr Adv Professor Ravivarma Kumar begins submissions.
CJ : Let us first understand the status of the petitioner. She has filed another writ petition and has filed a withdrawal memo in the other petition.
Kumar : Yes.
CJ : In that case, will allow the withdrawal of other.

CJ : Mr Sanjay Hegde has already made his argument in 2146. We will not hear anyone else.
Mir says Hegde made only preliminary submissions.
CJ : Please don't waste the time of the court. We will hear the other counsels.

Adv TaHir: Mr Hegde has argued only made submission on preliminary reliefs.
CJ : Sorry, this we will not allow. Mr.Hegde has made his submissions. We have noted.

Adv Tahir submits that a withdrawal memo has been filed in WP 2146/2022
AG : The point is, the arguments on behalf of Resham have been addressed. Same petitioner cannot urge the same questions of law on the same facts through different counsel.

Advocate General intervenes : The petition of Ravivarma Kumar is filed by one Ms Resham. This very petitioner has filed WP 2146/2022 in which Mr Hegde argued.
CJ : She has filed two petitions?
AG : Yes, she is one of the petitioners in another case. They have to justify.