Maharashtra Politics- Shiv Sena Vs Shiv Sena- Supreme Court Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

4 Aug 2022 10:39 AM IST

  • Maharashtra Politics- Shiv Sena Vs Shiv Sena- Supreme Court Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Hima Kohli is hearing petitions filed by petitioners belonging to Eknath Shinde and Uddhav Thackeray factions of Shiv Sena party in relation to disqualification proceedings, the election of Speaker, recognition of party whip, floor test for Shinde Government in the Maharashtra assembly and...

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Hima Kohli is hearing petitions filed by petitioners belonging to Eknath Shinde and Uddhav Thackeray factions of Shiv Sena party in relation to disqualification proceedings, the election of Speaker, recognition of party whip, floor test for Shinde Government in the Maharashtra assembly and proceedings initiated by the Election Commission of India on request made by the Eknath Shinde-led faction for their recognition as the 'real' Shivsena and their claim over the party's election symbol - the bow and arrow.

    Yesterday, the Top Court heard the preliminary arguments in the cases relating to the dispute between Uddhav Thackeray and Eknath Shinde arising out of the rift within the Shiv Sena political party. After hearing the senior lawyers appearing for both sides for over an hour, the bench adjourned the hearing till today morning, asking Senior Advocate Harish Salve (who appeared for Eknath Shinde group) to re-draft the written submissions for more clarity.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 4 Aug 2022 11:06 AM IST

      CJI : We cannot totally ignore the political party, it will be a danger to democracy.

    • 4 Aug 2022 11:05 AM IST

      Salve : Anti-defection law cannot be an anti-dissent law.

      CJI : What is the use of the whip then?

      Salve : There is no per se illegality principle, until and unless there is a finding of disqualification

    • 4 Aug 2022 11:00 AM IST

      Salve : If the speaker takes 1/2 months to decide. What does this mean? That they should stop attending the proceedings of the house? And all decisions taken are illegal.

    • 4 Aug 2022 11:00 AM IST

      Salve: If the annswer to question one is in affirmative and it is only when speaker renders a finding... this happens everytime and speaker tales a 2, 3 months to reach a conclusion.

    • 4 Aug 2022 10:59 AM IST

      Salve : Whether disqualification under 10 schedule takes place by if Speaker reaches a conclusion that a member votes against stand of party?hMy friends argue that its per se. If you committed an act for which you could be disqualified, you can automatically become disqualified

    • 4 Aug 2022 10:57 AM IST

      Matter taken. Sr Adv Harish Salve for Eknath Shinde reads the revised set of questions of law.

    Next Story