- Home
- /
- News Updates
- /
- Madras HC Advocates Stage Protests...
Madras HC Advocates Stage Protests Against Chief Justice Tahilramani's Transfer
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
9 Sept 2019 5:24 PM IST
The advocates of Madras High Court on Monday staged protests over the proposal to transfer Chief Justice V K Tahilramani.The Madras High Court Advocates Association has decided to do boycott Courts tomorrow as a mark of protest.Justice Tahilramani, the senior most among the Chief Justices of High Courts in the country, was proposed to be transferred to Meghalaya High Court by the Supreme...
The advocates of Madras High Court on Monday staged protests over the proposal to transfer Chief Justice V K Tahilramani.
The Madras High Court Advocates Association has decided to do boycott Courts tomorrow as a mark of protest.
Justice Tahilramani, the senior most among the Chief Justices of High Courts in the country, was proposed to be transferred to Meghalaya High Court by the Supreme Court collegium. On September 3, the Collegium rejected her request to reconsider the prove.
#Breaking 1st on TIMES NOW | Massive protests rock Chennai. Madras High Court lawyers stage protest over the transfer of Chief Justice Vijaya Tahilramani.
— TIMES NOW (@TimesNow) September 9, 2019
TIMES NOW's Shabbir with details. pic.twitter.com/rGhxALRL1w
Signalling protest against the proposal, Justice Tahilramani submitted her resignation to the President.
It is not a usual practice to transfer a Chief Justice to a smaller High Court. Madras High Court, a chartered High Court, has a sanctioned strength of 75 judges. Meghalaya High Court has at present two judges (including CJ) against a sanctioned strength of three judges. Her tenure as HC judge is till October 3, 2020.
Justice Tahilramani, who became a judge of Bombay High Court in June 2001, was appointed as the Chief Justice of Madras High Court in August 2018.
The protesting advocates said that the transfer was wholly unwarranted and arbitrary. They vouched for the integrity and efficiency of Justice Tahilramani, and said that the transfer was uncalled for.
Earlier, a group of lawyers had sent a representation to the Supreme Court seeking the withdrawal of the transfer proposal, saying "arbitrary transfers whittle away the independence of the judiciary and the confidence of judges".