LIVE UPDATES- MediaOne Channel's Plea Challenging Centre's Telecast Ban: Supreme Court Hearing

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

15 March 2022 9:21 AM GMT

  • LIVE UPDATES- MediaOne Channels Plea Challenging Centres Telecast Ban: Supreme Court Hearing

    The Supreme Court shall hear today the special leave petition filed by Malayalam news channel MediaOne against the judgment of the Kerala High Court which upheld the Centre's decision to not renew its telecast license citing national security grounds. The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath had issued notice on the matter (on 10 March), to consider...

    The Supreme Court shall hear today the special leave petition filed by Malayalam news channel MediaOne against the judgment of the Kerala High Court which upheld the Centre's decision to not renew its telecast license citing national security grounds.

    The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and Vikram Nath had issued notice on the matter (on 10 March),  to consider the prayer for interim relief.

    The bench had also asked the Centre to produce the relevant files (the files of the Home Ministry which raised national security concerns) on which the reliance was placed by the High Court.

    MediaOne approached the Supreme Court on March 2, hours after a division bench of the Kerala High Court upheld the recent ban imposed on it by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The channel contended that the exact reasons for the Centre's non-renewal of the license have not been revealed to them and the Court approved the decision on the basis of certain sealed cover files produced by the Ministry of Home Affairs, purportedly raising some national security concerns.

    The petitioner further contended that the impugned judgment was patently illegal since Clauses 9 and 10 of the uplinking and downlinking guidelines make it abundantly clear that for the purpose of renewal of license, security clearance is not a factor to be considered.

    During the previous hearing, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the channel, submitted that there was no complaint against the channel during its ten years of its functioning. There is no requirement for security clearance at the time of renewal. Rohatgi took serious objection to the High Court Division Bench calling for the files in sealed cover after the judgment was reserved.

    Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, also appearing for the channel, submitted that it had over 2.5 crore viewers. Even as late as on 2019, the downlinking permission was granted to it.

    FOLLOW THIS PAGE FOR LIVE UPDATES

    Live Updates

    • 15 March 2022 9:27 AM GMT

      Dave points out to the statement filed by ASG before the DB of HC. It's on page 7.

    • 15 March 2022 9:26 AM GMT

      ASG Raju: I just want a short date to file the affidavit.

      DYC J: What do they say on affidavit before the HC? Can we see that?

    • 15 March 2022 9:26 AM GMT

      DYC J: When did the closure take place?

      Dave: feb 8

      Nath J: Before that?

      Dave : We were working. My license was for 10 years. 2 months after my actual period expired, they allowed me to continue. They granted me downlinking in 2019 for a period of 5 years.

    • 15 March 2022 9:26 AM GMT

      ASG SV Raju seeks Court's permission to file an affidavit.

      Dave: They have filed the same before the HC's. there are millions of viewers.

    • 15 March 2022 9:25 AM GMT

      Dave: Not to renew the license & the DB accepts that renewal is automatic but then says security concerns will come into the way & security concerns only come in the beginning.

    • 15 March 2022 9:25 AM GMT

      Dave: Today there was matter before CJI where sealed cover was sought to be given to the court & the CJI said, " please don't give us sealed cover, we don't want it here."

      Sealed cover is the basis of law.

    • 15 March 2022 9:24 AM GMT

      Sr Adv Dushyant Dave for the Channel.

    Next Story