[LIVE-UPDATES] Hearing On Kangana Ranaut's Plea Against Demolition of Her Office Building

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

28 Sept 2020 11:21 AM IST

  • [LIVE-UPDATES] Hearing On Kangana Ranauts Plea Against Demolition of Her Office Building

    ...

    Live Updates

    • 28 Sept 2020 12:24 PM IST

      Saraf refers to Sub Vijay International Pvt ltd. vs. Commissioner, MCGM (2006). He says in that case the HC held that compensation should be awarded to the order if the Corporation has violated procedure in demolition, even if the construction was unauthorized.

    • 28 Sept 2020 12:08 PM IST

      The Court said that 15 days notice should be given for demolition, submits Saraf, referring to 'Sopan Maruti Thopte' decision of the HC.

    • 28 Sept 2020 12:08 PM IST

      The SC has approved the above decision in the 2019 judgment "Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai. vs M/S Sunbeam High Tech Developers" : Dr. Saraf, Kangana's lawyer.

    • 28 Sept 2020 12:07 PM IST

      Dr. Saraf refers to the 1996 decision of Bombay HC in

      Sopan Maruti Thopte vs Pune Municipal Corporation". SC called this decision a "locus classicus" on the subject, he adds. This decision contemplates personal hearing before demolition, he submits.

    • 28 Sept 2020 12:07 PM IST

      All of these (opportunities) have been denied because the authorities invoked a provision which was ex-facie not applicable : Saraf, Kangana's lawyer.

    • 28 Sept 2020 12:07 PM IST

      Parties also have the option to go for regularization. These opportunities were denied to Kangana as the authorities did not act according to the provisions : Saraf.

    • 28 Sept 2020 11:56 AM IST

      Kangana's lawyer Saraf makes two points :

      1. There was no construction going on. The notice was not issued on the basis of any finding that any work was in progress.

      2. Assuming work was being done, under Section 354A of the BMC Act, the authorities have to first issue notice giving an opportunity to the person to produce the permit. Straightaway demolition not contemplated.

    • 28 Sept 2020 11:51 AM IST

      The notice and the order are not in consonance with Section 354A of the BMC Act : Saraf for Kangana.

    • 28 Sept 2020 11:51 AM IST

      Saraf submits that there are cases where the civic body has permitted to retain the entirety of floors after regularization

    • 28 Sept 2020 11:51 AM IST

      Saraf submits that there are provisions for regularizations in the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act and the demolition notice ought to be kept pending while the regularization application is pending. Similar provisions are there in the BMC Act, he submits.

    Next Story