[Breaking] "If State Govts Targets Individual They Must Realise That SC is Here To Protect Them": Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail To Arnab Goswami

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

11 Nov 2020 10:23 AM IST

  • [Breaking] If State Govts Targets Individual They Must Realise That SC is Here To Protect Them: Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail To Arnab Goswami

    A division bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud & Indira Banerjee will hear at 10.30 AM the petitions filed by #ArnabGoswami & co-accused Neetish Sarda & Parveen Rajesh Singh against the Bombay High Court's denial of interim...

    A division bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud & Indira Banerjee will hear at 10.30 AM the petitions filed by #ArnabGoswami & co-accused Neetish Sarda & Parveen Rajesh Singh against the Bombay High Court's denial of interim bail.

    Live Updates

    • 11 Nov 2020 1:04 PM IST

      I did not file for quashing then because I was not worried about the police then, I am worried about the police now. Exactly what happened in Palghar Issue for against me, says Salve

      This particular case arises out of a suicide, Justice Chandrachud says 

    • 11 Nov 2020 1:02 PM IST

      I am journalist who had been saying unpalatable things. I can show this! I can show this basis discussions in Assembly! Political system is angry with me! How many times have your lordships seen political parties filing FIRs against a person like this, Salve for Arnab Goswamy

    • 11 Nov 2020 1:00 PM IST

      The rule is Bail not Jail. Not even a day more he should be in Jail, Salve for Arnab Goswamy

    • 11 Nov 2020 12:59 PM IST

      The heart of the matter is that - Does the court have jurisdiction?, yes. This Court does. I have served prima facie material. They will again do what they did in TRP case, they’ll get someone to make statements, says Salve

    • 11 Nov 2020 12:58 PM IST

      They have candidly said that FIR said what he does. If they had 164 statements, they should have done that before Magistrate. You have an FIR like this and arrest him and throw him in Jail! Salve says

    • 11 Nov 2020 12:57 PM IST

      A question is asked where was the complainant, my question is ... Where was the accused and why didnt he file for quashing of FIR in 2018? Desai says

    • 11 Nov 2020 12:56 PM IST

      I only said the matter is listed and it will be decided tomorrow, I didn’t argue further because allowing this will send out a wrong message. State will not interfere in investigation, will not interfere in process, says Kapil Sibal for State of Maharashtra

    • 11 Nov 2020 12:56 PM IST

      The habeas corpus was misconceived. Just because a person has reach to multiple fora does not mean it warrants interference, says Singh

    • 11 Nov 2020 12:53 PM IST

      Sentiments by court valuable and we deeply hold these principles dear but not in this case and not for this Gentleman concerned. Not for this gentleman but also for the fact that bail is pending, not a case for intervention of #Supreme Court of India, Singh says.

    • 11 Nov 2020 12:51 PM IST

      On November 4, there is Judiciary remand order. On November 7, liberty is given by HC following which the bail application is filed and then this SLP is filed. How does this lie? Singh says

    Next Story