Kolkata Doctor's Rape-Murder : Live Updates From Supreme Court | RG Kar Hospital Case

CJI: look at form 5363 and keep it ready, we will examine on the next hearing

CJI: (WB form 5371) the PRB form 54....a copy of the form duly filled in should be produced before the court in the next hearing

Sibal : no no all happened before it

CJI: SG stated that during the above challan is not part of file handed to CBI for investigation. It is submitted by one of the petitioner before the HC that the form was produced before HC in course of hearings. The form is unavailable with Mr Sibal and Astha Sharma 

CJI: damage has been done by circulation these photographs. All photographs of the dead body are to be removed forthwith

Sibal: including the seizure list

CJI: that happened when you were incharge of it

Luthra: one request- on social media the photographs of the victims are being circulated, this should not be happening

CJI: where did you get those photos?

Luthra: the fact is they are being circulated, one person given name of 10-20 main miscreants in this hospital

CJI: CISF has to ensure and tighten up measures who can access to the emergency ward, pls ask the CISF company to ensure that all necessary safety and precautions are taken

Geeta Luthra : this is completely botched up

Cousnel: even if you do a luminal test, you cannot say if the accused went to wash, the entire tiles (of washroom) was changed

Luthra: one is letting the people go inside the hospital without checking ID cards 

Sr Adv Karuna Nandy requests a status report on the safety of whistle blowers in the Sandip Ghosh Financial Irregularties Case- the two are connected, High Court also said

Another Counsel: I have names of the miscreants who came , who tampered with the evidence

Sibal: CBI itself has not said that seal is broken

Mahesh Jethmalani : we donot have clarity on the time of death, been a month since death

CJI: there is clarity (1) when the death occurred ; (2) the timing in around the death also that she had a meal before death, there is delay of 14 hours of filing FIR 

Counsel submits that before the HC, it was shown in CD

SG: the possibility of it being created subsequently should not be ruled out

Sibal: what should not be ruled be out ?