Husband Liable To Pay Maintenance When Marriage Was Annulled Due To His Fault : SC Upholds Kerala HC Order

The Supreme Court recently upheld a Kerala High Court judgment that held that where the marriage happened to be annulled or declared null and void due to some mischief or wrong committed by the husband, he will have to pay maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C despite declaration of nullity or annulment of marriage.

The bench comprising Justice R. Banumathi and Justice AS Bopanna, while dismissing a Special Leave Petition against the High Court judgment observed that it is not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment affirming the award of maintenance to the wife.

Section 125 CrPC defines "wife" to include a woman who has been divorced by, or has obtained a divorce from, her husband and has not remarried. In the instant case, the 'wife' applied for annulment of marriage on the ground of impotence of the husband, which was suppressed by him.

Before the High Court, the husband challenged the order directing him to pay maintenance, and contended that a wife whose marriage stands annulled will not come within the definition of 'wife' under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Reliance was placed on the judgment in Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v. State of Gujarat.

Rejecting the said contention, the High Court, relying on a later decision in Badshah v. Sou.Urmila Badshah Godse, held that, where the marriage happened to be annulled or declared null and void due to some mischief or wrong committed by the husband, he will have to pay maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C despite declaration of nullity or annulment of marriage. Justice P. Ubaid had observed:

The purport of the subsequent decision and the position of law settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Badshah's case is that nullity of marriage or annulment of marriage will not by itself disentitle the lady to claim maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. In a case where the marriage happened to be annulled or declared null and void due to some mischief or wrong committed by the husband, he will have to pay maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C despite declaration of nullity or annulment of marriage. Here is a case where the wife applied for annulment of marriage on the ground of impotence of the husband, which was suppressed by him. In such a situation, the decision of the Honb'ble Supreme Court in Badshah v Sou. Urmila Badshah Godse [ 2013 (4) KLT 367 (SC)) can be followed. In such a factual situation, where the husband suppressed material facts,and the lady suffered for no fault or wrong of her, the decision in Savitaben's case cannot be applied.

Click here to Read/Download SC Order

Click here to Read/Download HC Judgment

Read HC Judgment