Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-5 Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

14 Sept 2022 10:52 AM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-5 Live Updates

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special...

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.

    A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special leave petitions which challenge the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated March 15 which upheld the hijab ban.

    The SLPs have been filed against the judgment dated March 15 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, upholding Government Order dated 05.02.2022, which has effectively prohibited Petitioners, and other such female Muslim students from wearing the headscarf in their Pre-University Colleges. A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice JM Khazi held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam. The Bench further held the prescription of uniform dress code in educational institutions was not violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners.

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 1

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 2

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 3

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 4

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES OF TODAY'S HEARING HERE

    Live Updates

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:20 AM IST

      Sondhi about Nigerian judgment : Two, for Muslim girls it gives a sense of modesty.

      Justice Dhulia. : Can you take us through those portions?

      Sondhi reading out the relevant paragraphs.

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:19 AM IST

      Justice Dhulia : What were the facts of the case?

      Sondhi : The State of Nigeria had imposed a ban on wearing hijab except on religious days. The Court reversed it by 5:2 majority. The majority judgment was on three fold - one, scriptures mandate it, two,

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:18 AM IST

      Sondhi reads out portions from judgment of Supreme Court of Nigeria which state that Quranic verses mandate female Muslims must observe covering of their heads.

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:16 AM IST

      Sondhi referring to a recent judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria which held that the presciption against wearing hijab in schools was illegal.

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:15 AM IST

      J Dhulia - How is Dr.Ambedkar's quote relevant here?

      Sondhi : That a citizen must not be burdened with choosing between two rights. That is the predicament which the girls are facing.

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:14 AM IST

      Sondhi quotes Dr Ambedkar's statement that a person without employment might be forced to choose a job with less jobs and rights - unemployed are forced to waive fundamental rights.

      This is the Hobson's Choice, which the girls here are forced - Sondhi

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:12 AM IST

      Sondhi refers to National Education Policy, says it emphasizes on inclusive education.

      Sondhi refers to Sachar Committe report, says it concluded that Muslim women were facing discrimination due to practices of wearing hijab, burka.

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:09 AM IST

      Sondhi : In effect, many girls have been forced to make a choice, and they are forced out of education.

      Justice Gupta asks Sondhi to conclude soon

      Sondhi : I will take only 5 more mins.

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:09 AM IST

      Sondhi : There could be intra-faith differences, so the fact some girls choose not to wear is besides the point.

    • 14 Sept 2022 11:07 AM IST

      Sondhi quotes from US decision: State must show the justify intrusion into religious practice by showing it as the least possible intrustion in the legitimate state interest.

    Next Story