Karnataka Hijab Ban: Supreme Court Hearing DAY-4 -LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

12 Sept 2022 1:07 PM IST

  • Karnataka Hijab Ban: Supreme Court Hearing DAY-4 -LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special...

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.

    A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special leave petitions which challenge the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated March 15 which upheld the hijab ban.

    So far, the bench has heard Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat for the petitioners who argued that the Government Order, banning Hijabs in educational institutions violates students' fundamental rights under Article 19, 21 and 25 of the Constitution.

    During the course of hearing, the bench has also raised several queries like whether religious clothing can be worn in a government run institution in a secular country. The bench also asked the counsels whether if it is held that freedom of expression includes the freedom to dress, would it also include the freedom to undress?

    The SLPs has been filed against the judgment dated March 15 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, upholding Government Order dated 05.02.2022, which has effectively prohibited Petitioners, and other such female Muslim students from wearing the headscarf in their Pre-University Colleges. A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice JM Khazi held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam. The Bench further held the prescription of uniform dress code in educational institutions was not violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE:

    Live Updates

    • 12 Sept 2022 3:02 PM IST

      Justice Gupta : So in this case Article 26 is not applied?

      Mucchala : There is no religious denomination before the Court.

      J Gupta : So your argument is that the right to wear the veil comes from 25 and 19.

      Mucchala : Right.

    • 12 Sept 2022 3:01 PM IST

      Mucchala : So far as individual's rights are concerned, there is no question of application of essential religious practice. That question comes only when a religious denomination is asserting its right.

    • 12 Sept 2022 3:00 PM IST

      Mucchala : The entire question of essential religious practice developed in that line (Article 26 rights) and also under Article 25(2) when the State is making a law. 

    • 12 Sept 2022 3:00 PM IST

      Mucchala : Article 25 speaks of individual's right. Article 26 speaks about religious denomination's right. When a group asserts their right under 26, then the question comes what are matters of religion.

    • 12 Sept 2022 2:59 PM IST

      Muchhala : It is not the job of the court to say that why do you follow this scholar and not that scholar. It is not the job of the court.

    • 12 Sept 2022 2:59 PM IST

      Mucchala reads out the parts from the State's objections which state that there are differences among scholars regarding necessity of wearing of hijab.

      "Scholars may disagree, but what about lay people, they may pick up a practice", he adds.

    • 12 Sept 2022 2:52 PM IST

      Muchhala : Right to freedom of expression and freedom of conscience are inter related and complement each other. I have developed this point further .Please read my written submissions.

    • 12 Sept 2022 2:51 PM IST

      Muchhala quotes from Puttsawmay : Dignity cannot be separated from privacy. Privacy is the ultimate constitutional value for an individual. The choice of appearance are aspects of privacy.

    • 12 Sept 2022 2:51 PM IST

      Mucchala : I need not say how much of my religion I am following. I may express a part of my religion, I may choose not to express another party.

    • 12 Sept 2022 2:50 PM IST

      Muchhala continues reading from Puttaswamy judgment on right to privacy.

    Next Story