Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 11)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

25 Feb 2022 9:10 AM GMT

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 11)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.
    On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab. This arose in view of the AG's submission that the Government Order dated February 5, which has been challenged in the writ petitions, does not prescribe any ban on hijab and that it is only an ""innocuous" order which asks students to follow the uniforms prescribed by their institutions.
    During one of the previous hearing, the High Court clarified that the interim order passed by it on February 10, which prohibited wearing of religious dresses by students in classrooms, will apply to both degree colleges and Pre-University (PU) Colleges, where uniform has been prescribed.
    Yesterday, Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat made his rejoinder arguments for Muslim girl students, challenging the action of a government PU college in denying their entry for wearing a hijab (headscarf). Kamat argued that people who want to wear head scarf are denied right to education on the pretext of this GO. "Their right to education which is paramount is being put on back burner. As a state you should facilitate and create an enabling atmosphere."
    Opposing State's submissions on the aspect of Constitutional Morality, Kamat added that Sabarimala and Navtej Johar judgments that were cited by the Advocate General are "pro-choice" judgments. "Constitutional morality is pro-choice. It is a restriction on state power," he said.
    Yesterday, the Court also heard Senior Advocate AM Dar for students of another college who were denied entry. It also heard Senior Advocate Guru Krishnakumar for the Respondents.
    FOLLOW THE LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:02 AM GMT

      Jha quotes from the HC judgment : "In the second place, a uniform prescribed dress worn by the members of the Bar induces a seriousness of purpose and a sense of decorum which are highly conducive to the dispensation of justice...."

      Here it could be dispensation of education

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:01 AM GMT

      Justice Dixit : It was not school..

      Jha : It was in court. This is on the importance of dress code. There is another judgment by Kerala HC.

      He quotes "When a lawyer is in prescribed dress his identity can never be mistaken. ..

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:59 AM GMT

      Jha : The case was filed by a lawyer for wearing dhoti-kurta by advocates in court room. He argued that not permitting of dhoti-kurta was against national culture. Allahabad HC rejected.

      AIR 1974 All 133 - Prayag Das vs Civil Judge, Bulandshahr And Ors.

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:59 AM GMT

      Jha : For how many years courts are going to decide the issue of hijab, beard or burqa..

      Jha refers to an Allahabad HC decision on the importance of dress code.

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:55 AM GMT

      Adv Subhah Jha making submission. This petition is filed by practising advocate. (Ghanshyam Upadhyaya)

      Jha : It deals with safety, securuity & integrity of the nation. Every person can be aggrieved by what is happening in state of karnataka & it has sprialling effect across

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:54 AM GMT

      Adv Mohammed Tahir now making submission in wp 2146/2022

      Justice Dixit : Mr Kamat has already argued. We can't permit reply in installments.

      Tahir : Kamat has not argued this petition.

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:53 AM GMT

      Balakrishna : I am praying for an interim order that the media not chase them.

      CJ : We are dismissing your petition with the observation that aggrieved persons can make complaint before appropriate authorities.

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:51 AM GMT

      CJ : You have not made a complaint to the police.

      Balakrishana: It is impossible for the poor to walk up to the authorities and complain.

      CJ : We will say whosoever is aggrieved can make a complaint to appropriate authority.

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:50 AM GMT

      Balakrishana : Please look at the screenshots.

      CJ : You make a complaint to authorities they will act on it.

      Justice Dixit: There are various acts protecting children and women, use of that not in the form of PIL. Have you given any representation?

    • 25 Feb 2022 9:50 AM GMT

      Balakrishna : My grievances is that media houses be restrained to not interfere with my right to privacy. Media is showing shots of students and teachers removing burqa and showing 24/7.

      CJ : Where is that?

      Balakrishna : CD I have produced.

      CJ : CD we can't play.

    Next Story