Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 8)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

22 Feb 2022 2:07 PM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 8)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.

    On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab. This arose in view of the AG's submission that the Government Order dated February 5, which has been challenged in the writ petitions, does not prescribe any ban on hijab and that it is only an "innocuous" order which asks students to follow the uniforms prescribed by their institutions.

    "What is your stand?Whether hijab can be permitted in institutions or not?", the Chief Justice raised a pointed query.

    "The operative portion of the GO leaves it to the institutions", the AG submitted.

    "If institutions permit hijab, you have objections?", the CJ asked further

    "If the institutions are to permit, we would possibly take a decision as and when the issue arises...", the AG responded.

    "You have to take a stand", the CJI reiterated.

    "My answer is that we have not prescribed anything. The Order , it gives complete autonomy to institution to decide uniform. Whether students be allowed to wear dress or apprarel which could be symbol of religion, the stand of the state is.. element of introducing religious dress should not be there in uniform. As a matter of principle, the answer is in preamble of Karnataka Education Act which is to foster secular environment", the AG replied.

    FOLLOW THE LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:39 PM IST

      Justice Dixit : Source on which Mr Kamat banked upon can they be recognised as authorized?

      AG : In credits,they say website created by some volunteers

      Justice Dixit : Any High Court in country has considered it to be an authoritative source?

      AG : To my knowledge, No.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:37 PM IST

      AG :  Mr Kamat has relied on http://Quran.com . Sr Adv Devdatta Kamat confirms the same.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:36 PM IST

      AG : In Kerala High Court, what Justice Mustaque has done is, the Arabic version of this speaks of "Khumar", Khumar he says is the dress worn over head. There the reference is to Hadith. The judgment is pre-Shayra Bano and Sabarimala case.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:33 PM IST

      CJ : Do you mean to say that portion of the Quran the petitioners have relied also does not mention about Hijab?

      AG : Yes

      Justice Dixit : But Kerala High Court judgment has said..

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:32 PM IST

      AG now refers to Sura 33, Verse 59

      Chief Justice : It talks about a dress which is a long gown. Not headdress

      AG: They have relied upon. This is an area I would be more circumspect in making submission. Because it is very Holy.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:28 PM IST

      Justice Dixit referring to the Sura : Hijab as such is not mentioned.

      AG : That is what I wanted to point out.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:27 PM IST

      CJ: What you want to show from this?

      AG : Yusuf Ali for instance, the reliance placed by petitioners are on two Suras...Sura 24 Verse 31...

      "say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty .that they should draw their veils over their bosoms

      "....and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers..."

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:22 PM IST

      AG: Syed Yusuf Ali books also contains commentary. I would place it on record of the court. It is not for us to elaborate, I leave it to the court on how it is to be construed.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:21 PM IST

      AG : Petitioners have referred to http://Quran.com. It is a website created by few volunteers and it is not authorised. But translation is more or less the same in respect of these verses with which we are concerned.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:20 PM IST

      AG: Second book is by Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall. This was referred to Justice Chandrachud Senior in Shah Bano case. We have given the translations.

    Next Story