Hijab Ban In Karnataka- Supreme Court Hearing- Day-2 -LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

7 Sept 2022 1:17 PM IST

  • Hijab Ban In Karnataka- Supreme Court Hearing- Day-2 -LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court will continue the hearing the batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court's judgment which upheld the ban on the wearing of Hijab by Muslim girl students in some schools and colleges in the State. A bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear the matterIn the last hearing of the matter, the main arguments were started by Senior Advocate...

    Supreme Court will continue the hearing the batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court's judgment which upheld the ban on the wearing of Hijab by Muslim girl students in some schools and colleges in the State.

    A bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear the matter

    In the last hearing of the matter, the main arguments were started by Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde who stated that the Court did not need to go into the broader questions in the case, as it could be decided solely on the narrow point of whether the State Government had the power under the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 to prescribe the uniform. The arguments raised by Senior Advocate Hegde in the last hearings included a woman's right to elect to dress modestly, that scarf was already a part of uniform as a Chunni was permitted to be worn and; that the government did not have the power to prescribe uniform. Per contra, the Additional Solicitor General, K.M. Nataraj, appearing for the State of Karnataka had stated that the issue was very limited, and pertained to discipline in school alone. The Advocate General of Karnataka, Prabhuling Navadgi had also submitted that there was no government interference in the matter and the decision of permitting students to wear Hijab had been left to the College Development Councils.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:17 PM IST

      Kamat : The long and short of the argument of the other side is you excercise the right outside the school. This argument came to be rejected in the Bijoe Emmanual case.

      J Gupta : The national anthem case!

      Kamat : Yes, and in that case, the petitioners were on a weaker footing

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:16 PM IST

      Kamat : Whether a student citizen is expected to surrender her fundamental rights under Article 19,21 and 25 as a pre-condition to access education?

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:15 PM IST

      Kamat : The judgments are in the context of fundamental rights in disability rights issue. But the reasonable accommodation principle comes from jurisdictions of America and South Africa, which I will place.

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:15 PM IST

      Kamat : Principle of reasonable accommodation has received your lordships imprimatur in many judgments. 

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:14 PM IST

      Kamat refers to House of Lords judgment which did not allow jilbab, as school has provided reasonable accommodation of headscarf.

      "The question is whether a particular dress is a reasonable accommodation", Kamat.

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:13 PM IST

      Kamat : It is a case of headscarf, it is not a burqa or jilbab..they are different.

      Justice Gupta : Burqa covers from head to toe. What is jilbab?

      Kamat : Jilbab is an Urdu word. There is an interesting judgment of house of lords judgment.

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:12 PM IST

      Kamat : I am not challenging the prescription of uniform. Your lordships are right, can anybody turn up in a jeans? I respectfully bow down. I do not challenge the uniform. The challenge is against the State saying it will not allow student to wear hijab despite wearing uniform.

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:11 PM IST

      Kamat : This is not a matter which is simply a violation of a statute or a rule. This involves a primary question as to whether the State has failed in its obligation to provide for reasonable accommodation for a student's rights under Articles 19, 21 and 25.

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:11 PM IST

      Kamat : My endeavour will be to persuade your lordships to refer the matter to constitution bench under Article 145(3) of the Constitution.

    • 7 Sept 2022 2:10 PM IST

      Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat appearing in the lead petition Aishat Shifa versus State of Karnataka.

      Kamat says Dr. Rajeev Dhawan is unwell and he will cover his arguments.

    Next Story