Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-8 Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

20 Sept 2022 10:15 AM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-8 Live Updates

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special...

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.

    A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special leave petitions which challenge the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated March 15 which upheld the hijab ban.

    The SLPs have been filed against the judgment dated March 15 passed DAY 6by the High Court of Karnataka, upholding Government Order dated 05.02.2022, which has effectively prohibited Petitioners, and other such female Muslim students from wearing the headscarf in their Pre-University Colleges. A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice JM Khazi held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam. The Bench further held the prescription of uniform dress code in educational institutions was not violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners.

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 2

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 3

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 4

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 5

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 6

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 7

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES OF TODAY'S HEARING HERE:

    Live Updates

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:36 AM IST

      Dave on Constituent Assembly Debates: I am not for a moment saying that they are fixed but they help us understand the thought process and to that extent they are important. To understand their intent, and mindset.

      Justice Dhulia : for purposive interpretation.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:35 AM IST

      Justice Gupta : The individual opinions in the Constituent Assembly, they are the individual opinions. After that, they have given us the Constitution. So are the individual opinions important?

      Dave : They are important to the extent of understanding the thought process.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:32 AM IST

      Justice Gupta : We have only a limited question, whether the headgear can be permitted with the uniform.

      Dave : For Muslims, the headgear cannot be prohibited.

      J Gupta : We have been hearing the arguments for the past 8 days.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:31 AM IST

      Dave : The finest of the social organisation today the RSS they have a uniform, they have a headgear.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:31 AM IST

      Dave : Uniform is an unnecessary burden on the majority section of the society. Many people don't have the money to buy uniforms.

      Justice Gupta : Uniform is a leveller, to avoid disparity. Your richness or poverty can't be made out from the uniform.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:29 AM IST

      Dave : I would add Article 25 is an article of tolerance.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:29 AM IST

      Dave quotes from Bijoe Emmanuel - Article 25 is an article of faith in the Constitution, incorporated in recognition of the principle that the real test of a true democracy is the ability of even an insignificant minority to find its identity under the country's Constitution.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:28 AM IST

      Dave quotes from Bijoe Emmanuel- If the two circulars are to be so interpreted as to compel each and every pupil to join in the singing of the National Anthem despite his genuine religious objection, then such compulsion would clearly contravene the rights

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:26 AM IST

      Dave : Bijoe Emmanuel decision is important for two reasons. Not only for interpreting Article 25 but also because it interprets the Kerala Education Act which is pari materia with the Karnataka Education Act.

    • 20 Sept 2022 11:23 AM IST

      Justice Gupta requests Dave to give a written note too.

    Next Story