Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-8 Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

20 Sept 2022 10:15 AM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-8 Live Updates

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special...

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.

    A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special leave petitions which challenge the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated March 15 which upheld the hijab ban.

    The SLPs have been filed against the judgment dated March 15 passed DAY 6by the High Court of Karnataka, upholding Government Order dated 05.02.2022, which has effectively prohibited Petitioners, and other such female Muslim students from wearing the headscarf in their Pre-University Colleges. A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice JM Khazi held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam. The Bench further held the prescription of uniform dress code in educational institutions was not violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners.

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 2

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 3

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 4

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 5

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 6

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 7

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES OF TODAY'S HEARING HERE:

    Live Updates

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:30 PM IST

      Justice Gupta : It was a treat to hear you Mr.Dave.

      Dave : So grateful.

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:27 PM IST

      Dave : High Court has fallen into error. I submit the judgment is wholly unsustainable, the impugned circular is unconstitutional, illegal and issued for legal malice and violates Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25.

      Dave concludes.

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:27 PM IST

      Dave : Ultimately what did Tagore say, that we must wake up in a country where fear does not exist, we must not put people in fear.

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:26 PM IST

      Dave quotes Swami Vivekanada's Chicago speech : "Secterianism, bigotry, and its horrible descen­dant, fanaticism, have long possessed this beautiful earth. They have filled the earth with vio­lence, drenched it often and often with human blood, destroyed civilization"

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:26 PM IST

      Dave quotes Swami Vivekanada's Chicago speech : I am proud to belong to a religion which has taught the world tolerance and universal acceptance..we accept all religions as true...I am proud to belong to a nation which has protected all persecuted...

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:24 PM IST

      Dave refers to ICCPR and says international conventions say minorities' rights have to be protected.

      Justice Gupta : This was argued by Meenakshi Arora and Jayna Kothari.

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:24 PM IST

      Dave : 11th and 12th standard students are not part of regimented forces, they are students they must be in a liberal environment, and we are wearing uniform, wearing hijab in the colour of uniform.

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:23 PM IST

      Dave refers to SC decision which held airman cannot keep beard as part of Islamic faith, says - there the entire stress is on disciplined force in Air Force.

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:23 PM IST

      Dave reading out from written submissions filed before HC - says one HC judgment referred in circular was about a Muslim girl in an all-girls school, the other one was about a convent school, the third one had no discussion about hijab.

    • 20 Sept 2022 12:23 PM IST

      Dave : There is a judgment of Kerala HC which supports the petitioners. It has not been appealed against by the Union. It has strong persuasive value.

    Next Story