Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi-LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

9 Dec 2021 5:11 AM GMT

  • Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafris Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi-LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheswari and CT Ravikumar will hear the matter today. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, on behalf of Zakia Jafri, will conclude his...

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.

    A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheswari and CT Ravikumar will hear the matter today.

    Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, on behalf of Zakia Jafri,  will conclude his rejoinder arguments today. Later,  Mukul Rohatgi will surrejoin.

    On Wednesday, apart from contending lack of investigation and questioning the conduct of SIT in the particular matter, Mr. Sibal also argued on the bonafides of Petitioner No. 2 (Teesta Setalvad), against whom he submitted the State and SIT had engaged in a lengthy 'diatribe'. Reiterating his submission for the sake of clarity, he argued that upon diligent investigation of the Tehelka tapes, material with respect to other people would have surfaced, which ultimately could have been perused, to establish a larger conspiracy. Countering Mr. Rohatgi's submissions commending the SIT for an impeccable investigation, Mr. Sibal iterated that in fact, it was the inadequacies in the investigation that has affected the case of larger conspiracy alleged by the Petitioner against the highest State functionaries in the Gujarat riots of 2002.

    Stay On This Page For Live Updates From The Hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:42 AM GMT

      Sibal: Then they(SIT) talk about Nambi Narayan, which is extraneous to these proceedings. Then they(SIT) rely on Nanavati Commission, on which I have already submitted.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:42 AM GMT

      Sibal: Para 33. Sting of Arvind Pandeya. He(SIT) says he was only PP before Nanavati Commission. He (Arvind) said he was collaborating with defence. Now, Para 38. In closure they(SIT) said Rahul Sharma did his job, now they are criticising him.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:42 AM GMT

      Sibal: The other person they deal with is Haresh Bhatt. His testimony does not only relate to his presence in Ahmedabad. This is again revealed first time before this Court.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:41 AM GMT

      Sibal: He(SIT) tries to prove falsity by referring to Babu Bajrangi. Babu Bajrangi on the basis of this very tape has been convicted. He(SIT) cannot now say that it is false. This has been said for the first time before SC, never before Mag, never before HC.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:38 AM GMT

      Sibal: Kindly see para 26. It is said sting is not part of the complaint. Then Milords, para 31. (SIT) Says that ex facie false claims made in tapes make them unreliable.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:38 AM GMT

      Sibal: In the second note, now. Para 10, Milords. No parading of dead bodies. Neither Mag’s judgment, nor HC judgment show any allegation that I have raised about parading of bodies from Godhra to Ahmedabad. Parading was in the procession to funeral.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:24 AM GMT

      Sibal: We do not have the translation. We will give the translation.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:24 AM GMT

      Bench: In that Mamtaldar thing, is there acknowledgment of anyone taking the body?

      Sibal: Yes

      Bench: Let us see that once...There is no acknowledgement. What does this letter say?

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:23 AM GMT

      Sibal: One or two more things from the note. Final note part 1. List of dates by SIT. A letter was written by Mamlatdar, that one. Over the page, at 1pm CM took decision to call the army. So, decision to call army was taken on 1pm. This is their notes.

    • 9 Dec 2021 5:17 AM GMT

      Sibal: The expunged remarked about Teesta Setalvad is in (2004) 10 SCC 88.

    Next Story