Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi And State Functionaries- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

7 Dec 2021 6:22 AM GMT

  • Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafris Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi And State Functionaries- LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar, will take up the part-heard matter for further hearing.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta will continue his arguments...

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.

    A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar, will take up the part-heard matter for further hearing.

    Solicitor General Tushar Mehta will continue his arguments on behalf of the State of Gujarat today.

    On the last occasion, highlighting the relevant portions from the Trial Court and High Court judgments to demonstrate the elaborate consideration of the allegations by the courts below, Mr. Rohatgi concluded his arguments on behalf of SIT. 

    Referring to the periodic tables in the case of Meghaninagar filed in Supreme Court, relied upon by Mr. Rohatgi to show that the witnesses came to the Investigating Officers with prepared statements, SG Tushar Mehta submitted that some of the witnesses stated that they were tutored and prepared by Teesta Setalvad. Considering that the conduct of the Petitioner is crucial in a Special Leave Petition filed under Article 136 of the Constitution, Mr. Mehta wanted the Court to look into the motivation for filing it. Mr. Mehta also took the Court through the allegations and findings on the issues of discrepancies in the accounts; funds of the Trusts being utilised for private purposes; accounts not audited for a long time.

    Stay On This Page For Live Updates From The Hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:26 AM GMT

      Sibal: The SC said that the Mag. will deal with the trial of accused based on this final report. Not relating to complaint, not w.r.t. Gulberg.

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:26 AM GMT

      Sibal: The Supreme Court is aware that Gulberg trial is going on, they assigned the Magistrate who took cognisance of the Gulberg matter, because Zakia was resident of Gulberg and no other reason.

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:25 AM GMT

      Sibal: Milords it is a fresh report. It is collected by SIT after the Court asked it to look into it. This material is not just the complaint, not just limited to Gulberg.

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:12 AM GMT

      Sibal: The Court said investigate all these. Not Gulberg. 

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:12 AM GMT

      Sibal: If everything was hunky dory in Gujarat, why would NHRC seek transfer of trials. 

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:11 AM GMT

      Sibal: Argument is made what is wrong with VHP. In the tapes the lawyers who were PPs reveal things that they have done, would shock the conscience of the Court. SIT says how does it matter.

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:10 AM GMT

      Sibal: And the Court said burden should be shifted. The SIT never took objection. Suddenly her (Teesta) image is being besmirched.

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:10 AM GMT

      Sibal: In between what happened? The NHRC went to SC. That is how the appellant became an intervenor. The appellant (Teesta) who is now blacklisted, worked with the NHRC.

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:09 AM GMT

      Sibal: This also is somewhat curious. My Ld. Friend and SG had argued that the State did what it could, there was no issue. And the State took all steps. In 2003, the SC stayed the nine trials. Why did this court stay the nine trials?

    • 7 Dec 2021 7:06 AM GMT

      Sibal: Another statement was made that there was no violence till 1 o’clock. If there was no violence till 1, why did you call army at 2.

    Next Story