Farmers Protest : Supreme Court Proposes To Stay Implementation Of Farm Laws- Live Updates

Dave : Lot of farmers in states ruled by the ruling party have been prevented from coming to the protests.

CJI : We told last time also Court is not going to decide issues like who should enter Delhi etc. It is for the police to decide.

AG : Please direct that they should not do such things if they want to get any consideration from this court.

Dushyant Dave for a farmers group : We are not going to do that(tractor march on Jan 26)

CJI : We are glad that Dave has said this.

AG : Please direct that they should not do such things if they want to get any consideration from this court.

AG : Please direct that they should not do such things if they want to get any consideration from this court.

CJI : We should not be understood as saying we are protecting any law breaker. We are not encouraging preventing of laws. In fact, we propose to pass the order to prevent violence and breaking of laws.

AG says 'unfortunate incidents' happened when the Haryana Chief Minister wanted to meet the protesters. Violence happened and many journalists, including one Supreme Court correspondent, got injured, he adds.

AG : We cannot expect a petition under Article 32 seeking implementation of laws.

AG submits that he has not seen any argument in any of the petitions raising the above three points. The law is a crystallization of the recommendations of several committees. Only two or three states are objecting while many other are helping.

AG submits that he has not seen any argument in any of the petitions raising the above three points. The law is a crystallization of the recommendations of several committees. Only two or three states are objecting while many other are helping.

AG : Court cannot stay a legislation unless the court finds that (1) law is passed without legislative competence (2) law violates fundamental rights (3) law violates other provisions of constitution.