EWS Reservation- Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing DAY 2- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

14 Sep 2022 5:03 AM GMT

  • EWS Reservation- Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing DAY 2- LIVE UPDATES

    The Supreme Court Constitution Bench will commence the hearing on the cases challenging the constitutional validity of reservation for economically weaker section of citizens. The petitions challenge the validity of Constitution (103rd) Amendment Act 2019. Economic reservation in jobs and education was proposed to be provided by inserting clause (6) in Articles 15 and 16 of the...

    The Supreme Court Constitution Bench will commence the hearing on the cases challenging the constitutional validity of reservation for economically weaker section of citizens. 

    The petitions challenge the validity of Constitution (103rd) Amendment Act 2019. Economic reservation in jobs and education was proposed to be provided by inserting clause (6) in Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution through the amendment passed by the Parliament in January 2019. The newly inserted Article 15(6) enabled the State to make special provisions for advancement of any economically weaker section of citizens, including reservations in educational institutions. It states that such reservation can be made in any educational institution, including private institutions, whether aided or unaided, except minority educational institutions covered under Article 30(1). It further states that the upper limit of the reservation will be ten percent, which will be in addition to the existing reservations. After the amendment was notified by the President, a batch of petitions were filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of economic reservation.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:31 AM GMT

      Kumar: It prohibits discrimination on enumerated grounds- religion, caste, sex. Why did the constitution prohibit discrimination? Constitution framers found that our society is uneven. It's divided on basis of religion, race, sex, caste

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:28 AM GMT

      Kumar: Pavitra too has gotten into this in detail. These doctrines operate in different areas. First, principle of equal opportunity which should be made available to everyone, that is reinforced by many provisions in Constitution- Article 15(1)...

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:27 AM GMT

      Kumar: This is substantive equality. First one is to ensure equal opportunity and second is to ensure that country emerges as a casteless and classless, egalitarian society.

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:26 AM GMT

      Kumar: Article 14 has two limbs. First part is doctrine of equal opportunity. Second part is equal protection of laws. [Reads Article 14].

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:26 AM GMT

      Kumar: all those who are rejected they have been now given the benefit of 10% reservation.

      CJI: Champakam was in era when there was no 16(6). So can that be sanctioned?

      Kumar: I agree. This is a prelude to show that unconstitutional exercise has been given a colour of authority.

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:23 AM GMT

      Kumar: Every list published by every govt is a list of caste, tribe, communities who are certified as not included in list of backward classes. Mandal commission didn't recognise, states didn't. Those who are adequately represented aren't included in list.

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:21 AM GMT

      Kumar: This ratio has stood the test of time and has been followed in Balaji, Indira Sawhney, Ashok Kumar...

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:20 AM GMT

      [Kumar quotes from the judgement]: "...The other categories including Muslims, Anglo-Indians, shall be treated other than backward Hindus..."

      Kumar: [continues quoting] "Petitioner may be far more qualified and if there were no reserved posts, he would be appointed but he cannot expect those posts reserved for others only because he is Brahmin even if he has better qualifications...communal G.O. is void"

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:16 AM GMT

      Prof Kumar explains the reservation policy which was challenged and struck down in the Champakam Dorairajan judgement.

    • 14 Sep 2022 5:15 AM GMT

      Kumar: In Champakam, the reservation policy of Mysore was challenged. It was struck down by Madras HC. [Refers to the HC judgment]



    Next Story