Electoral Bonds Case Live Updates : Supreme Court Hearing Of SBI's Time Extension Plea, Contempt Petitions Against SBI Chairman

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

11 March 2024 3:03 AM GMT

  • Electoral Bonds Case Live Updates : Supreme Court Hearing Of SBIs Time Extension Plea, Contempt Petitions Against SBI Chairman

    The Supreme Court will hear today the application filed by the State Bank of India seeking an extension of time till June 30 to furnish information relating to the Electoral Bonds.As per the judgment delivered on February 15, the Bank had to furnish the information to the Election Commission of India by March 6. The SBI was required to share information such as the purchaser of the bonds,...

    The Supreme Court will hear today the application filed by the State Bank of India seeking an extension of time till June 30 to furnish information relating to the Electoral Bonds.

    As per the judgment delivered on February 15, the Bank had to furnish the information to the Election Commission of India by March 6. The SBI was required to share information such as the purchaser of the bonds, their denomination, who encashed the bonds and the date of encashment to the ECI, following which the ECI was required to publish these details on its website by March 13.

    The SBI has sought additional time stating that it has to compile and decode information relating to the sale of twenty-two thousand two hundred and seventeen (22,217) electoral bonds.

    The Court will also hear today contempt petitions filed against SBI Chairman Dinesh Kumar Khara for the failure of the Bank to disclose the information by March 6.

    The contempt petitions have been filed by NGOs  Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), Common Cause and the political party Communist Party of India (Marxist).

    A 5-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra will hear the matters at 10.30 AM today.

    Follow this page for live-updates.

    Live Updates

    • 11 March 2024 5:37 AM GMT

      Salve : We can put an affidavit.

      J Gavai : To what extent it has been done?

      Salve : The problem is that I can't make a mistake, in a hurry to give numbers..

    • 11 March 2024 5:36 AM GMT

      CJI : Our judgment is dated 15 Feb. We are on 11 March. In past 26 days, what steps you have taken? Nothing is stated. It should have been disclosed. That this is the work which have done, we need time to more..We expect some candour from the State Bank of India

    • 11 March 2024 5:35 AM GMT

      Justice Gavai : We have not asked to correlate it with the purchaser and the political party.

      Salve : In that paragraph it is suggested.

      J Gavai : Don't go by what is suggested, go by what is stated.

    • 11 March 2024 5:34 AM GMT

      Salve : I have full details of who purchased the bond. That is in one silo. I have another set of information of which political party encashed, that is not a problem.

    • 11 March 2024 5:33 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna : You say all purchaser details are kept in a sealed cover. You just need to open the sealed cover and give the details.

      Justice Khanna : EC was asked to give a sealed cover with details during the course of hearing, which we have not opened.

    • 11 March 2024 5:32 AM GMT

      CJI : Even your FAQs indicated that for every purchase that you had to have a separate KYC. So every time a purchase was made, KYC was mandated.

      Salve : We have the details, I am not saying we don't have.

    • 11 March 2024 5:31 AM GMT

      Salve : We knew that it was sensitive information. A physical procedure was devised. Only the bond number was cleared and the bond number was used for further purchases. And it was done to prevent the gossip that so and so have purhcased.

    • 11 March 2024 5:31 AM GMT

      Salve : When the purschases were happening, we had divided the information..

      CJI : But ultimately all details were sent to the Mumbai main branch.

    • 11 March 2024 5:30 AM GMT

      CJI : Now if you see the direction we have issued, we have not you to told you to do the matching exercise. We have directed a plain disclosure.

      CJI : So to seek time saying that a matching exercise is to be done is not warranted, we have not directed you to do that.

    • 11 March 2024 5:29 AM GMT

      CJI : It is submitted (in application) that matching information from one silo to another is time-consuming process...

    Next Story