DEMONETISATION Valid Or Not? : Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

24 Nov 2022 5:15 AM GMT

  • DEMONETISATION Valid Or Not? : Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court Constitution Bench to hear petitions challenging the #Demonetization of Rs 500 & Rs 1000 currency notes by Central Govt in 2016.On Oct 12, the Centre was directed to file a comprehensive affidavit & disclose relevant docs.Constitution Bench comprising S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna JJ decided to hear this case after holding that...

    Supreme Court Constitution Bench to hear petitions challenging the #Demonetization of Rs 500 & Rs 1000 currency notes by Central Govt in 2016.

    On Oct 12, the Centre was directed to file a comprehensive affidavit & disclose relevant docs.

    Constitution Bench comprising S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna JJ decided to hear this case after holding that the legal issue had not become "academic".

    Senior Adv and four-time Finance Minister P Chidambaram gave a brief overview of his arguments.

    "Where is the application of mind?" the senior counsel asked.

    On Nov 9, the Attorney-General, R. Venkataramani sought an extension for the filing of a comprehensive affidavit.

     "It is embarrassing that a Constitution Bench has to adjourn like this," Bench remarked.

    A week later, the Centre filed an affidavit saying 2016 demonetisation was "well-considered" and led to benefits.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES OF TODAY'S HEARING HERE 

    Live Updates

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:21 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: My second submission is that this arbitrary executive action is violative of Aa 14, 19, 21. If not read down, it would be unguided and uncanalised power and an instance of excessive delegation, in the absence of any guidelines.

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:21 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: The effect is the same as the 1946 and 1978 episodes, except that they passed a notification. The ques is, does S 26 give the govt this power? My submission is, no.

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:19 AM GMT

      Chidambaram takes the court through the notification dated 08.11.2016 [3407(E)] by which denominations of the extant series of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 currency notes ceased to be legal tender.

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:19 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: What has happened in 2016, has happened. But the court must now clarify that such an uncanalised power cannot be exercised by the executive government, so that this does not happen again.

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:18 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: Suppose a new series is issued. Can an executive govt demonetise it the very next day? This power does not exist with the govt. If they even assert that they have this power, this court must set the record straight.

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:11 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: It would also be absurd and arbitrary if this section conferred the power to demonetise notes that were issued a week earlier. You have to apply your mind, and then make a recommendation to the GoI, which may or may not accept.

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:10 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: 1946 ordinance was made on Jan 12, 1946. S 26A was introduced in 1956.

      "This is like making a double lock on the door. Ordinance of 1946 was one lock, S 26A was another lock."

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:09 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: Therefore, S 26 gave limited powers to demonetise any series of a denomination. If you wanted to demonetise all series of a denomination, you had to pass a special legislation. That is the submission.

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:06 AM GMT

      Chidambaram turns next to the 1978 ordinance that demonetised high-denomination banknotes, which was later replaced by an act.

      "Why did they have to say notwithstanding anything contained in S 26, if this section conferred the power?"

    • 24 Nov 2022 6:06 AM GMT

      Nazeer J: Another ques, when an Act governs a particular situation, for instance, S 26(2), can you exercise plenary legislation?

      Chidambaram: Because S 26(2) did not contain the power to demonetise all series of a denomination.

    Next Story