DEMONETISATION Valid Or Not? : Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

24 Nov 2022 10:45 AM IST

Live Updates

24 Nov 2022 4:04 PM IST
Chidambaram: Demonetisation must be held to a much higher standard. If there is one major economic decision taken in last 10-20 years which affected the lives of all citizens, it is demonetisation.

Chidambaram concludes.
Bench rises.
24 Nov 2022 4:01 PM IST
Chidambaram: The mildest step would have been to stop issuing certain currency notes. The second option was to replace the currency already issued with new notes w better security features. The third and most extreme is demonetisation.
24 Nov 2022 3:56 PM IST
Chidambaram: I have to conclude by saying that there is no evidence that they examined any alt methods to deal w the problem of fake currency, etc. Demonetisation is an extreme step.
24 Nov 2022 3:56 PM IST
Chidambaram, relying on lead judgement of Sikri J in the 2018 Aadhar constitutionality case.

"Rules are disproportionate - a mere ritualistic incantation of “money laundering”, “black money” does not satisfy the first test," he quotes.
24 Nov 2022 3:51 PM IST
5. K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India [(2019) 1 SCC 1]
6. Sukhnandan Saran Dinesh Kumar v Union Of India [(1982) 2 SCC 150]
24 Nov 2022 3:50 PM IST
BVN J: You must appreciate this judgement because it reads like a movie plot and ends with a climax.

Nazeer J says something to VR J, who reveals, "My brother is saying, will there be a Baahubali 2?"

(Everyone laughs)
24 Nov 2022 3:50 PM IST
4. Internet & Mobile Assn. of India v Reserve Bank of India [(2020) 10 SCC 274]

"This is Justice V Ramasubramanian's decision on cryptocurrency."
24 Nov 2022 3:40 PM IST
4. Lt. General Manomoy Ganguly Vsm v Union of India [(2018) 18 SCC 83]

"Court can ensure all relevant factors are taken into consideration and, no irrelevant considerations have crept in in the decision-making process," Chidambaram quotes.
24 Nov 2022 3:40 PM IST
3. Centre for Public Interest Litigation v Union of India [(2012) 3 SCC 1]

"What is the procedure the Minister followed, and that procedure was found to be improper."
24 Nov 2022 3:32 PM IST
Chidambaram takes the court through a number of judgements on the power of judicial review.

1. Tata Cellular v Union Of India [AIR 1996 SC 11]
2. Uttamrao Shivdas Jankar v. Ranjitsinh Vijaysinh Mohite Patil [(2009) 13 SCC 131]

>Load More

DEMONETISATION Valid Or Not? : Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Live Updates

Chidambaram: Demonetisation must be held to a much higher standard. If there is one major economic decision taken in last 10-20 years which affected the lives of all citizens, it is demonetisation. Chidambaram concludes. Bench rises.

Chidambaram: The mildest step would have been to stop issuing certain currency notes. The second option was to replace the currency already issued with new notes w better security features. The third and most extreme is demonetisation.

Chidambaram: I have to conclude by saying that there is no evidence that they examined any alt methods to deal w the problem of fake currency, etc. Demonetisation is an extreme step.

Chidambaram, relying on lead judgement of Sikri J in the 2018 Aadhar constitutionality case. "Rules are disproportionate - a mere ritualistic incantation of “money laundering”, “black money” does not satisfy the first test," he quotes.

5. K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India [(2019) 1 SCC 1] 6. Sukhnandan Saran Dinesh Kumar v Union Of India [(1982) 2 SCC 150]

BVN J: You must appreciate this judgement because it reads like a movie plot and ends with a climax. Nazeer J says something to VR J, who reveals, "My brother is saying, will there be a Baahubali 2?" (Everyone laughs)

4. Internet & Mobile Assn. of India v Reserve Bank of India [(2020) 10 SCC 274] "This is Justice V Ramasubramanian's decision on cryptocurrency."

4. Lt. General Manomoy Ganguly Vsm v Union of India [(2018) 18 SCC 83] "Court can ensure all relevant factors are taken into consideration and, no irrelevant considerations have crept in in the decision-making process," Chidambaram quotes.

3. Centre for Public Interest Litigation v Union of India [(2012) 3 SCC 1] "What is the procedure the Minister followed, and that procedure was found to be improper."

Chidambaram takes the court through a number of judgements on the power of judicial review. 1. Tata Cellular v Union Of India [AIR 1996 SC 11] 2. Uttamrao Shivdas Jankar v. Ranjitsinh Vijaysinh Mohite Patil [(2009) 13 SCC 131]

Tags

Chidambaram: Demonetisation must be held to a much higher standard. If there is one major economic decision taken in last 10-20 years which affected the lives of all citizens, it is demonetisation.

Chidambaram concludes.
Bench rises.

Chidambaram, relying on lead judgement of Sikri J in the 2018 Aadhar constitutionality case.

"Rules are disproportionate - a mere ritualistic incantation of “money laundering”, “black money” does not satisfy the first test," he quotes.

5. K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India [(2019) 1 SCC 1]
6. Sukhnandan Saran Dinesh Kumar v Union Of India [(1982) 2 SCC 150]

BVN J: You must appreciate this judgement because it reads like a movie plot and ends with a climax.

Nazeer J says something to VR J, who reveals, "My brother is saying, will there be a Baahubali 2?"

(Everyone laughs)

4. Internet & Mobile Assn. of India v Reserve Bank of India [(2020) 10 SCC 274]

"This is Justice V Ramasubramanian's decision on cryptocurrency."

4. Lt. General Manomoy Ganguly Vsm v Union of India [(2018) 18 SCC 83]

"Court can ensure all relevant factors are taken into consideration and, no irrelevant considerations have crept in in the decision-making process," Chidambaram quotes.

3. Centre for Public Interest Litigation v Union of India [(2012) 3 SCC 1]

"What is the procedure the Minister followed, and that procedure was found to be improper."

Chidambaram takes the court through a number of judgements on the power of judicial review.

1. Tata Cellular v Union Of India [AIR 1996 SC 11]
2. Uttamrao Shivdas Jankar v. Ranjitsinh Vijaysinh Mohite Patil [(2009) 13 SCC 131]