Contempt Case Against Patanjali & Baba Ramdev Over Medical Ads : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

2 April 2024 10:50 AM IST

  • Contempt Case Against Patanjali & Baba Ramdev Over Medical Ads : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

    The Supreme Court is hearing today the contempt case against Patanjali Ayurved over the publication of advertisements claiming medical cures.Patanjali MD Acharya Balkrishna and Baba Ramdev were directed to be personally present before the Court today. The petition was filed by the Indian Medical Association.After the Supreme Court Rap, Patanjali MD submitted an unqualified apology for...

    The Supreme Court is hearing today the contempt case against Patanjali Ayurved over the publication of advertisements claiming medical cures.

    Patanjali MD Acharya Balkrishna and Baba Ramdev were directed to be personally present before the Court today. The petition was filed by the Indian Medical Association.

    After the Supreme Court Rap, Patanjali MD submitted an unqualified apology for publishing medical advertisements.

    A bench comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah will hear the matter at 10.30 AM. Follow this page for live updates.


    Live Updates

    • 2 April 2024 11:23 AM IST

      J Amanullah: You have to also explain that why the action was not taken against the States.

      Mehta: IMA says that there cannot be a criticism against allopathy....I say that it can be

      J Amanullah: We have observed that he has done a very good job for yoga...let not dig holes

    • 2 April 2024 11:19 AM IST

      J Kohli: We are wondering why the UOI chose to keep their eyes shut

    • 2 April 2024 11:18 AM IST

      J Kohli: You do mention that you gave a notice to them, you chose not to file the reply. We are wondering why?

      You said that it is not you and the States, we are impleading them as parties....

      Lastly, you yourself had said that the product they come out with them cannot be backed with. What did you do to publicize the same with the common public? 

    • 2 April 2024 11:15 AM IST

      SG Mehta (For UOI): I can not sit with the clients and I can sit with the counsels...affidavit should have been on record.

      J Kohli: If they want to drag their feet then let it be 

    • 2 April 2024 11:14 AM IST

      SG Mehta (For UOI): We cannot take sides. What I am suggesting is if Your Lordship permits, then I can sit with the counsel and (decide) what can be done.

      J Kohli: We will decide that

    • 2 April 2024 11:13 AM IST

      SG Mehta (For UOI): As an officer of the Court...What has happened should not have happened. It appears that the way the affidavits should have come has not come today. My concern is the ministry of justice..

    • 2 April 2024 11:11 AM IST

      Singh: I am requesting this Court to note my presence and unconditional apology to the Court

    • 2 April 2024 11:11 AM IST

      J Kohli: You have to abide by the undertaking given to the Court...You have broken every barrier..Now to say that you are sorry...

      Singh: It is going to be a lesson for them

      J Kohli: We are not here to teach lessons...they say that they have conducted research they owe a greater explanation and not just to the public but to the Court 

    • 2 April 2024 11:08 AM IST

      J Kohli: Mr Rohatgi was there, and he said that he will appear for both parties..we made it clear that we will take it seriously...it is not coming as a surprise.

      J Amanullah: if they wanted to apologize to the Court, they should have been the first ones to say

      Singh: I cannot run away from this court. Can I read a few paragraphs? Can I say with folded hands that the gentleman is present in the Court and the Court may record his apology

    • 2 April 2024 11:04 AM IST

      Singh: We wanted to apologise in person. The person is present in the court.

    Next Story