Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Against ED Arrest : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

17 May 2024 2:07 PM IST

  • Arvind Kejriwals Plea Against ED Arrest : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

    The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear at 2.30 PM today the petition filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in connection with the Delhi liquor policy case.A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta is likely to conclude the hearings today. Yesterday, the...

    The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear at 2.30 PM today the petition filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in connection with the Delhi liquor policy case.

    A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta is likely to conclude the hearings today. Yesterday, the bench heard the arguments of the ED against the petition. The bench said yesterday that it will give ED 15 minutes today and 45 minutes for the rejoinder arguments of Kejriwal.

    Last week, the bench granted interim bail to Kejriwal till June 1.

    Follow this page for live updates.

    Live Updates

    • 17 May 2024 3:47 PM IST

      Singhvi: Question was what weight will you give to both versions? Right side is the only 1 inculpatory statement. On the left there are 9 exculpatory statements. Zero weight given

    • 17 May 2024 3:45 PM IST

      Singhvi: In grounds of arrest, ED details involvement of co-accused, alongside Kejriwal

      J Khanna: Buchi Babu is not an accused? MSR is an accused in predicate offense?

      Singhvi: MSR is not accused. Buchi Babu in predicate

    • 17 May 2024 3:44 PM IST

      J Khanna: We want you to specifically (address facts)

      Singhvi: I will start with facts

    • 17 May 2024 3:44 PM IST

      ASG: IO can't be suffocated by anybody else. It's the duty of IO to form opinion. Maybe a different IO would have formed another opinion. But that is no ground to...

      ASG: That's all Mr Raju? Yes, Mr Singhvi?

      J Khanna: 15-20 mins on facts, Mr Singhvi. Law you can argue no difficulty

    • 17 May 2024 3:44 PM IST

      ASG: They have not pointed out...it does not cut reasons to believe...nothing to show reasons are bad. Submissions are only on 9 statements and approver statements, which is about credibility. On facts he has no case!

    • 17 May 2024 3:44 PM IST

      ASG: It has to be prima-facie, it can't be a full...

      Singhvi: It's 3.35, he should be fair

      J Khanna: Mr Raju, 2 mins more

    • 17 May 2024 3:44 PM IST

      ASG: No, that's not what I am saying...just that it has to be less than "grave suspicion". The expression reasons would change depending on stage

      J Datta: Then the statute would have been worded differently. Why these words are there?

    • 17 May 2024 3:41 PM IST

      J Khanna: In Preventive Detention, you have to consider both material?

      ASG: that is more technical. If we don't consider relevant material, it goes

      J Khanna: I'm on the parity

      ASG: Can't be equated with normal law

    • 17 May 2024 3:32 PM IST

      ASG: Fishing and roving enquiry is not permitted at this stage.

      ASG: Their defense regarding 9 statements can't be gone into at the discharge stage. How can it be looked at in context of arrest? Unheard of.

      ASG: Their defense regarding 9 statements can't be gone into at the discharge stage. How can it be looked at in context of arrest? Unheard of.

      ASG: In every case accused will say so...this will delay investigation. If it is done, it will open Pandora's box. He gets an opportunity at bail stage, when the burden is reversed

    • 17 May 2024 3:27 PM IST

      ASG: There is a distinction between criminal law and ordinary administrative law

    Next Story