Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Against ED Arrest : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

16 May 2024 5:51 AM GMT

  • Arvind Kejriwals Plea Against ED Arrest : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

    The Supreme Court is hearing Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's petition challenging the arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in connection with the alleged Delhi liquor policy scam.Last week, the Court had allowed Kejriwal's release on interim bail till June 1 for the purposes of election campaigning. A bench comprising Justices...

    The Supreme Court is hearing Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's petition challenging the arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in connection with the alleged Delhi liquor policy scam.

    Last week, the Court had allowed Kejriwal's release on interim bail till June 1 for the purposes of election campaigning. 

    A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta is hearing the matter.  


    Live Updates

    • 16 May 2024 6:13 AM GMT

      SG: When there are flagrant violations of fundamental rights, there can be. But sometimes, agencies are required to discharge an unpleasant duty which they know will be abused publicly

    • 16 May 2024 6:13 AM GMT

      SG: That is not the scope of your Lordships' jurisdiction. If S.19 is a trigger to approach under Art 226, then S.41 CrPC also is

      J Khanna: There have been cases...one bench has issued notice on what should be the contours of Art 32. Petitions have been entertained, arrests have been held to be bad. Is that not correct?

    • 16 May 2024 6:11 AM GMT

      SG: HC called for papers. DB examined them. Thereafter, court did not go into sufficiency of material. Rightly so. Mini-trial is what your Lordships are called upon to conduct. We are opposing that

    • 16 May 2024 6:11 AM GMT

      J Khanna: Some other matter had also come up on that day, when we said go before the trial court. We refused to entertain

      ASG: Ultimate relief can't be granted. Until they challenge final order...

      SG: when he was not arrested, he approached High Court that I should not be arrested

    • 16 May 2024 6:10 AM GMT

      J Khanna: They filed writ petition before us, we did not open the gates for them

      ASG: Before arrest, they filed the petition. It was wrongly mentioned remand has been granted

      J Khanna: No, they said it has been moved.

    • 16 May 2024 6:05 AM GMT

      J Khanna: 226 remedy can't be excluded. We don't exercise that jurisdiction, because there are alternative remedies. But we overlook when there is a grave case. They certainly challenged their order

      J Datta: There was a remand order. Before HC, it was challenged

      J Khanna: If first remand order is challenged, it will remain even after second or third remand order

    • 16 May 2024 6:05 AM GMT

      J Datta: you have to satisfy that however high case is pitched before us, under S.19 we can't

      J Khanna: If there is violation of S.19 conditions, obviously courts can interfere. Either remand court, or High Court

    • 16 May 2024 6:05 AM GMT

      SG: He consented

      J Datta: what if he had not consented? Is it your submission that under S.19, in no case a writ petition under 226 lies?

    • 16 May 2024 6:04 AM GMT

      SG: Suspicion is usually subjective. I am too big to go to Trial Court to go to bail. The remand court will also examine all this. I will go to the High Court

      J Khanna: He went to the trial court. after it rejected, he went to HC

    • 16 May 2024 5:59 AM GMT

      SG: Please juxtapose with Art 226...which they have invoked

    Next Story