Arvind Kejriwal's Bail : Live Updates From Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

5 Sep 2024 4:20 AM GMT

Share this

Arvind Kejriwals Bail : Live Updates From Supreme Court

Listen to this Article

The Supreme Court will hear today Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's bail plea in the CBI case related to the liquor policy case.

A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan will hear the matter

Kejriwal was earlier granted interim bail by the Supreme Court in the case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in relation to the liquor policy. However, his incarceration continued since he was under custody in the case under the Prevention of Corruption Act registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation.

Follow this page for live updates.

Live Updates

5 Sep 2024 9:39 AM GMT
ASG: At arrest stage, you can't do merit review as far as reasons to believe concerned. Some questions were referred to larger bench. Interim bail may be recalled by larger bench.
5 Sep 2024 9:35 AM GMT
J Bhuyan: That was only for elections
ASG: And in the other, arrest has been upheld!
Singhvi: Completely wrong statement. Necessity to arrest has not been upheld. Otherwise, how interim bail was granted?
5 Sep 2024 9:33 AM GMT
ASG: Arrest is not bad. Regardless of whether or not S.41A applies. Now, those two interim bail orders in Kejriwal's favor...
5 Sep 2024 9:32 AM GMT
ASG: Kejriwal's application in High Court has been called out. I can't be at two places at once
Singhvi: Court is adjourning it
5 Sep 2024 9:28 AM GMT
ASG: I arrested him when (b),(c) and (d) were complied with. I could still arrest him and court permitted me.
J Kant: Your argument is S.41 power was not taken away, even if you resort to S.41A
5 Sep 2024 9:28 AM GMT
ASG: It's not that a person who is issued notice under s.41A can't be arrested ever. Suppose we have not given him S.41A notice, is the arrest illegal? Does it warrant his being enlarged on bail?
5 Sep 2024 9:26 AM GMT
ASG: for reasons to be recorded, we can still arrest person. There is no complete embargo to arrest a person to whom...we had the power to go and arrest him straightaway. He did not cooperate, misled, when we took another route
5 Sep 2024 9:25 AM GMT
ASG: When we applied to court for S.41A permission, at that time, we had no intention of arresting. Later, we found we were entitled to arrest him under (b),(c),(d)
5 Sep 2024 9:24 AM GMT
J Kant:Only process for you was he could come via court. Did you apply for permission from court, on facts?
ASG: Yes. Under S.41A.
5 Sep 2024 9:23 AM GMT
ASG: There is implied compliance, whether police goes to him, or he comes to police.
Singhvi: He applies under S.41A!
J Kant: He was not a free person to whom S.41A notice could be issued. Court was his de jure guardian. You cannot invoke S.41A.

Next Updates Previous Updates

Arvind Kejriwal's Bail : Live Updates From Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Live Updates

ASG: At arrest stage, you can't do merit review as far as reasons to believe concerned. Some questions were referred to larger bench. Interim bail may be recalled by larger bench.

J Bhuyan: That was only for elections ASG: And in the other, arrest has been upheld! Singhvi: Completely wrong statement. Necessity to arrest has not been upheld. Otherwise, how interim bail was granted?

ASG: Arrest is not bad. Regardless of whether or not S.41A applies. Now, those two interim bail orders in Kejriwal's favor...

ASG: Kejriwal's application in High Court has been called out. I can't be at two places at once Singhvi: Court is adjourning it

ASG: I arrested him when (b),(c) and (d) were complied with. I could still arrest him and court permitted me. J Kant: Your argument is S.41 power was not taken away, even if you resort to S.41A

ASG: It's not that a person who is issued notice under s.41A can't be arrested ever. Suppose we have not given him S.41A notice, is the arrest illegal? Does it warrant his being enlarged on bail?

ASG: for reasons to be recorded, we can still arrest person. There is no complete embargo to arrest a person to whom...we had the power to go and arrest him straightaway. He did not cooperate, misled, when we took another route

ASG: When we applied to court for S.41A permission, at that time, we had no intention of arresting. Later, we found we were entitled to arrest him under (b),(c),(d)

J Kant:Only process for you was he could come via court. Did you apply for permission from court, on facts? ASG: Yes. Under S.41A.

ASG: There is implied compliance, whether police goes to him, or he comes to police. Singhvi: He applies under S.41A! J Kant: He was not a free person to whom S.41A notice could be issued. Court was his de jure guardian. You cannot invoke S.41A.

Tags

J Bhuyan: That was only for elections
ASG: And in the other, arrest has been upheld!
Singhvi: Completely wrong statement. Necessity to arrest has not been upheld. Otherwise, how interim bail was granted?

ASG: Kejriwal's application in High Court has been called out. I can't be at two places at once
Singhvi: Court is adjourning it

ASG: I arrested him when (b),(c) and (d) were complied with. I could still arrest him and court permitted me.
J Kant: Your argument is S.41 power was not taken away, even if you resort to S.41A

J Kant:Only process for you was he could come via court. Did you apply for permission from court, on facts?
ASG: Yes. Under S.41A.

ASG: There is implied compliance, whether police goes to him, or he comes to police.
Singhvi: He applies under S.41A!
J Kant: He was not a free person to whom S.41A notice could be issued. Court was his de jure guardian. You cannot invoke S.41A.