Arvind Kejriwal's Bail : Live Updates From Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

5 Sept 2024 9:50 AM IST

  • Arvind Kejriwals Bail : Live Updates From Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court will hear today Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's bail plea in the CBI case related to the liquor policy case.A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan will hear the matterKejriwal was earlier granted interim bail by the Supreme Court in the case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in relation...

    The Supreme Court will hear today Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's bail plea in the CBI case related to the liquor policy case.

    A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan will hear the matter

    Kejriwal was earlier granted interim bail by the Supreme Court in the case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in relation to the liquor policy. However, his incarceration continued since he was under custody in the case under the Prevention of Corruption Act registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation.

    Follow this page for live updates.

    Live Updates

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:57 AM IST

      Singhvi: Court said it would amount to making Sisodia play game of snakes and ladders

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:56 AM IST

      Singhvi citing Manish Sisodia's case

      Singhvi: My friend's reading of Supreme Court's order was that Sisodia must start over the ladder again

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:55 AM IST

      Singhvi: There was no business of applying S.41(2). The ld. judge is able to use this mis-application to dis-apply judicial precedents (Arnesh, Antil). Very serious error

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:54 AM IST

      Singhvi: Mine is a cognizable offense.

      J Kant: We don't want to go into the debate. S.41(2) is like a protection, it's not harsher than S.41(1). If Court by mistake applies it, it means court is granting some sort of benefit

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:52 AM IST

      Singhvi: High Court mis-applied S.41(2) which applies only to non-cognizable offence. This argument dislodges compliance with S.41,S.41A. Ex-facie error.

      J Kant: S.41(2) is probably an exception to S.41(1)

      Singhvi: No.

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:52 AM IST

      Singhvi: About sending back, SC has used a phrase - snacks and ladders (in Manish Sisodia case).

      ASG: Sisodia was relegated...here, he has not even gone once

      Singhvi: i don't know how many orders it will take for my friend to not take dilatory...

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:50 AM IST

      Singhvi: You can't send me back to trial court, which has considered the same thing

      J Kant: Probably your point is that it would be an exercise in futility

      Singhvi: It's not a fair argument to raise by CBI at this stage. Except if delay is sought.

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:46 AM IST

      Singhvi: I am asked to go back to trial court. HC has concurrent right, I concede. But you must exercise discretion to send it back. My friend's preliminary objection is don't hear. The ld. judge heard on merits for full day!

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:45 AM IST

      Singhvi: Trial Court says timing of arrest is little odd. Triple test is fully satisfied. It's an irony now that every possible co-accused has been released. Except maybe one. Sisodia, Kavitha, Buchi Babu

    • 5 Sept 2024 11:44 AM IST

      Singhvi: In 2023, CBI called me as witness. MCC came in March. ED arrested. SC released me on 10th May. And trial Court in June. How is there necessity to arrest? What happened in the 3 months while I was in custody?

    Next Story