The Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases challenging the Centre's 2019 decisions to dilute Article 370 of the Constitution leading to the scrapping fo the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.Today is the 7th day of hearing before a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant. So...
The Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases challenging the Centre's 2019 decisions to dilute Article 370 of the Constitution leading to the scrapping fo the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.
Today is the 7th day of hearing before a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant. So far, Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal, Gopal Subramanium and Zaffar Ahmed Shah have completed their arguments on behalf of the petitioners.
Track the live-updates from today's hearing here :
Live Updates
2023-08-17 05:04:01
17 Aug 2023 11:29 AM IST
CJI: Article 370 works itself out and achieve its purpose once the Constituent Assembly of J&K has completed its task. Then where was the occassion thereafter to issue constitutional orders post 1957?
17 Aug 2023 11:26 AM IST
Dave: This Article has lived its life and achieved its purpose. 370(1) survives because if tomorrow the Constitution is amended and a new article is inserted, we would want it to apply to J&K also.
17 Aug 2023 11:25 AM IST
Dave: It was a one time exercise. It was not intended to be exercised again and again. Even the Constituent Assembly could not do it again. Suppose they passed a resolution later saying now we want to get out of India? Was that permissible? No.
17 Aug 2023 11:24 AM IST
Dave: Constituent Assembly said we want to be part of India, we want to continue with Article 370 and that was accepted by President. Where does he have power to re-exercise this now. It would be travesty of justice if GOI says that governor can act on it.
17 Aug 2023 11:22 AM IST
Dave: It was never intended to be permanent. It is a temporary provision. The entire power of decision to make it applicable was left to Constituent Assembly. President can't exercise powers now and say that 370 stands repealed.
17 Aug 2023 11:20 AM IST
Dave: Why is it temporary? Why? Because democracy. You could only do it if Constituent Assembly approved it.
17 Aug 2023 11:18 AM IST
Dave: State govt has to be understood in the context of democracy. Not as governor exercising omnibus powers.
17 Aug 2023 11:18 AM IST
Dave: All other articles were to be applied by the President subject to this exercise of power under clause (d) read with proviso. So if it is part of IoA, with consultation. If it is outside, concurrence of the state govt.
17 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Dave: 370(1)(c) is most important. Please see. "The provisions of Art 1 and this Art shall apply to the State." Meaning that all other articles shall not apply.
17 Aug 2023 11:15 AM IST
Dave: You persuade citizens of a state, a country - at that time an independent state to accede to you. They agree.
Justice Gavai: Who requested the government of India? The Raja did.
Dave: Raja requested but he expressly asked for this protection.