Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing [Day 9]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

23 Aug 2023 4:59 AM GMT

  • Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing [Day 9]

    A Constitution Bench will resume hearing today the batch of petitions challenging the dilution of #Article370 of the Constitution which took away the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.The bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice SK Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant is likely to close the arguments from the petitioners' side...

    A Constitution Bench will resume hearing today the batch of petitions challenging the dilution of #Article370 of the Constitution which took away the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.

    The bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice SK Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant is likely to close the arguments from the petitioners' side today.

    Follow this page for live updates.

    Live Updates

    • 23 Aug 2023 10:07 AM GMT

      Sankarnarayanan refers to an earlier attempt of the Indian Parliament to abrogate Article 370.

      He reads from the extract of Gulzarilal Nanda.

    • 23 Aug 2023 10:06 AM GMT

      Sankarnarayanan: The J&K Constitution refers to the Constitution of India. All the COs refers to Constitution of J&K. So there is a bridge. Acknowledgement is there even in correspondence.

    • 23 Aug 2023 10:05 AM GMT

      CJI: The idea was to gradually bring J&K in mainstream...

      Sankarnarayanan: Which is thankfully what has happened.

    • 23 Aug 2023 10:04 AM GMT

      CJI: Does that mean that anything said by the Constituent Assembly of J&K would bind the parliament?

    • 23 Aug 2023 10:03 AM GMT

      GS: For simple reason that when the Indian constitution specifically recognises a Constituent Assembly for only one state in the country and says that Constituent Assembly has the task of deciding to abrogate the clause or not, the CA and it's task is constitutionally recognised

    • 23 Aug 2023 10:02 AM GMT

      CJI: Though the Constitution of J&K framed its relationship with the UOI, unless that relationship is embodied in the Indian Constitution, how will it bind the dominion of India or parliament and the executive?

    • 23 Aug 2023 10:01 AM GMT

      CJI: Is there not intrinsic evidence that 370 itself is self limiting once the Constituent Assembly has come to an end? Then do we say that our constitution must be so read to see the Constitution of J&K as an overriding doc which we'll apply in preference to our Constitution?

    • 23 Aug 2023 9:56 AM GMT

      CJI: If 370 works itself out...

      Sankarnarayanan: If it works itself out, it can't be touched.

      CJI: If a text itself shows its self limiting character, the whole operation of 370 has to come to an end once the Constituent Assembly comes to an end.

    • 23 Aug 2023 9:55 AM GMT

      CJI: If the terminal point of 370 is the Constituent Assembly's work, then is it not necessary that the work of the Constituent Assembly of the state of J&K has to be embodied in this constitution to make it operational?

      Sankarnarayanan: It's not necessary because it's not provided for in the Constitution.

    • 23 Aug 2023 9:53 AM GMT

      CJI: The other view possibly is can the Constitution of a federated unit ever rise above the source of the federating unit?

    Next Story