Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 2]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

3 Aug 2023 4:39 AM GMT

  • Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 2]

    A Constitution Bench will resume hearing today the batch of petitions challenging the dilution of Article370 of the Constitution which took away the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.In yesterday's proceedings, Sr Adv Kapil Sibal argued that Article 370 could not be abrogated as J&K Constituent Assembly never recommended it before its dissolution. The bench also discussed the...

    A Constitution Bench will resume hearing today the batch of petitions challenging the dilution of Article370 of the Constitution which took away the special status of  Jammu and Kashmir.

    In yesterday's proceedings, Sr Adv Kapil Sibal argued that Article 370 could not be abrogated as J&K Constituent Assembly never recommended it before its dissolution. The bench also discussed the 'temporary' nature of the provision.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai and Surya Kant is hearing the matter.

    Live updates from the hearing can be tracked here :

    Live Updates

    • 3 Aug 2023 9:01 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna: The explanation enacted was probably in 1952- which was added in clause (1). At that time there was no legislative assembly. There was no council of ministers.

      Sibal: That shouldn't arise. We're talking about powers of constituent assembly.

    • 3 Aug 2023 9:00 AM GMT

      Sibal: How can you interpret a term in the constitution which says 'constituent assembly' as a legislative assembly. I don't understand. Under what interpretation can we do that? There's no implied or express power. That way we can change any definition.

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:59 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna: When they made it, there was no legislative assembly. That's a fact. So when we interpret the term here can we interpret it to include legislative assembly?

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:58 AM GMT

      Sibal: It's not flexibility at the hand of parliament. Because 147 says there is no flexibility at all.

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:58 AM GMT

      Sibal: They contemplated it. Why else would they add the word "constituent assembly"?

      Justice Khanna: Because at that time we didn't have any legislative assembly for the State of J&K

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:57 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna: The proviso puts a pre-condition.

      Sibal: It's a flexibility at the instance of the Constituent Assembly, not at the instance of Parliament.

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:56 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna: If the objective was not to put Article 370 in a straitjacket, which is obviously clear; it's a flexible article...

      Sibal: That has nothing to do with 370(3). There's no flexibility there.

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:55 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna: Why can't we accept the argument that constituent assembly for the proviso could in a sense be interpreted to include legislative assembly, keeping in mind the fact that the parliament could have very well amended Art 370 also.

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:53 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna: At the time when the constitution was adopted, there was no constitution of J&K and no constituent assembly but they were aware that constituent assembly will be made. So why can't we interpret the Constitution?

    • 3 Aug 2023 8:52 AM GMT

      Justice Khanna: There's a slight difference between Art 370 and what is the state and it's object/purpose- one, there is an element of flexibility in Art 370 in the form of consultation or something else.

    Next Story