Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 2]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

3 Aug 2023 4:39 AM GMT

  • Article 370 Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day 2]

    A Constitution Bench will resume hearing today the batch of petitions challenging the dilution of Article370 of the Constitution which took away the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.In yesterday's proceedings, Sr Adv Kapil Sibal argued that Article 370 could not be abrogated as J&K Constituent Assembly never recommended it before its dissolution. The bench also discussed the...

    A Constitution Bench will resume hearing today the batch of petitions challenging the dilution of Article370 of the Constitution which took away the special status of  Jammu and Kashmir.

    In yesterday's proceedings, Sr Adv Kapil Sibal argued that Article 370 could not be abrogated as J&K Constituent Assembly never recommended it before its dissolution. The bench also discussed the 'temporary' nature of the provision.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai and Surya Kant is hearing the matter.

    Live updates from the hearing can be tracked here :

    Live Updates

    • 3 Aug 2023 6:00 AM GMT

      Sibal: It's not just the question of application. It's the question of substantive understanding of what 370 is.

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:59 AM GMT

      Sibal: You're now to apply provisions of the Constitution of India. And they're all incorporated in the order. So 356 comes there, Part III, Preamble, DPSPs- come there but that's all with concurrence. Therefore, it didn't come at this stage. That came later.

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:57 AM GMT

      Sibal: First schedule deals with entries and this deals with (d).

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:57 AM GMT

      Sibal: "In addition to the provisions of Art 1 and 370, the only other provisions of the Constitution which shall apply shall be those specified in the second schedule..."- This is applicable to (d).

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:55 AM GMT

      Sibal refers to the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1950.

      Sibal: Kindly see the index of this. This will show you the kind of orders passed from time to time. By this time there are about 54 orders.

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:54 AM GMT

      CJI: No, in the sense that a marginal note doesn't control the meaning of the text.

      Sibal: 370(1)(c) or Art 3, can't! A marginal note cannot say that it is temporary so I read this in this fashion. That can't be done.

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:52 AM GMT

      Sibal: It's only a marginal note, not the heading of 370.

      CJI DY Chandrachud: No doubt about that.

      Sibal: Your lordships have held in Keshavananda Bharati itself that you can't look at these notes.

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:52 AM GMT

      Sibal: 370 can't be touched. All other things can be.

      Justice Khanna: (c) doesn't say 370 cannot be touched! In fact, it makes it very clear that it can be touched.

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:49 AM GMT

      CJI: The other interpretation is that even if you're not making any exception or modification, but you're making some provision of the Constitution applicable to the State of J&K, you still require consultation or concurrence.

      CJI DY Chandrachud: The question is which is the most plausible construction?

    • 3 Aug 2023 5:48 AM GMT

      CJI: If it relates to something other than a (b)(i) subject, you require concurrence of the State. So it's only where you're making exceptions or modifications to the Constitution that you require either consultation or concurrence.

    Next Story