#SupremeCourt to continue hearing the challenge against the All India Bar Examination. (Day 2)The #ConstitutionBench comprises Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, A.S. Oka, Vikram Nath, and J.K. Maheshwari.Follow Live Updated Here...
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing the challenge against the All India Bar Examination. (Day 2)
The #ConstitutionBench comprises Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, A.S. Oka, Vikram Nath, and J.K. Maheshwari.
Follow Live Updated Here
Live Updates
2022-09-28 05:41:26
28 Sep 2022 7:24 AM GMT
Justice Kaul: What do you want?
Counsel: I have a problem w post-enrolment exam.
28 Sep 2022 7:23 AM GMT
Counsel: The role of the Courts is to construct and not to destruct.
Justice Kaul: We have been constructing and de-constructing for a long time.
28 Sep 2022 7:23 AM GMT
Counsel concurring: This is an Article 14 challenge.
28 Sep 2022 7:23 AM GMT
Justice Kaul: From what I understand, your grievance is that someone who has not enrolled before the intro of the exam, will not be required to take the exam. Only if you have enrolled in the period specified will you be required to take the exam.
28 Sep 2022 7:22 AM GMT
Counsel refers to the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015.
28 Sep 2022 7:22 AM GMT
Justice Kaul: A person after graduating starts doing something else. If he comes at 50-55 years of age, is he required to take the exam?
28 Sep 2022 7:16 AM GMT
Mishra clarifies: The rule is prospective.
Justice Khanna: Read the rule carefully. Will the main portion not stand independent, apart from the clarificatory portion?
28 Sep 2022 7:16 AM GMT
Counsel: If a person who has graduated before the introduction of bar exam, is applying for enrolment, they will not have to take the exam.
Justice Kaul: The exam needed to be introduced at some point.
28 Sep 2022 7:12 AM GMT
The technical glitch has been resolved.
Counsel: I will refer to one particular rule u/Chap III, i.e., Rule 9 this is what I am challenging as unconstitutional.
28 Sep 2022 7:12 AM GMT
Counsel for one of the petitioners is seen arguing, but there is no audio.