Existing User Account
Gift Premium
Subscribe Premium

Best Of 2022- 15 Important Supreme Court Judgments on Administrative Law with Parallel Citations

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

2 Jan 2023 10:12 PM IST

    • Best Of 2022- 15 Important Supreme Court Judgments on Administrative Law with Parallel Citations

    Accountability - Three essential constituent dimensions. (i) responsibility, (ii) answerability and (iii) enforceability. Vijay Rajmohan v. State, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 832 : AIR 2022 SC 4974Administrative / executive order / circular cannot be given retrospective effect in the absence of any legislative competence. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Tata Communications Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw (SC)...


    1. Accountability - Three essential constituent dimensions. (i) responsibility, (ii) answerability and (iii) enforceability. Vijay Rajmohan v. State, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 832 : AIR 2022 SC 4974
    2. Administrative / executive order / circular cannot be given retrospective effect in the absence of any legislative competence. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Tata Communications Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 792 : 2022 (14) SCALE 1
    3. Supreme Court upholds Tamil Nadu go fixing 50% marks for eligibility to undergo TTC course for appointment in state. Director of Teacher's Training Research Education v. OM Jessymol, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 759
    4. Inter departmental communications / file notings cannot be relied upon as a basis to claim any right. Mahadeo v. Sovan Devi, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 730 : AIR 2022 SC 4071
    5. Maternity leave under CCS Rules can't be denied because woman's husband has two children from his previous marriage. Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 718 : AIR 2022 SC 4108
    6. CAT cannot dispense with trial even if contempt was committed in the face of it, when alleged contemnor denies charges. Mehmood Pracha v. Central Administrative Tribunal, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 692 : AIR 2022 SC 3933
    7. Supreme Court explains scope of judicial review of administrative action based on subjective opinion/satisfaction of authority. Amarendra Kumar Pandey v. Union of India, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 600
    8. Ex-Personnel of armed force reemployed in Govt. services not entitled to pay scales at par with his last drawn pay. Union of India v. Anil Prasad, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 513 : 2022 (9) SCALE 34
    9. The requirement to give reasons is satisfied if the concerned authority has provided relevant reasons. Mechanical reasons are not considered adequate. Ram Chander v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 401 : AIR 2022 SC 2017
    10. If there is difference between CAT judicial member & administrative member, refer to 3rd member; reference to full bench not required. Daljit Singh v. Arvind Samyal, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 364
    11. Term of office of a nominated member of wakf board can be curtailed. State of Maharashtra v. Shaikh Mahemud, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 363 : 2022 (6) SCALE 104
    12. Order can't be termed "mala fide" just because it is illegal, erroneous or perverse. Chandra Prakash Mishra v. Flipkart, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 359 : 2022 (6) SCALE 40
    13. Importance of natural justice and an opportunity of hearing to be afforded to the affected party in any administrative or quasi­ judicial proceedings. Esteem Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Chetan Kamble, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 226 : 2022 (4) SCALE 284
    14. Employee can be terminated for suppression or false information regarding suitability. Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 798 : 2022 (14) SCALE 270
    15. Tribunal decisions can be scrutinized only by a jurisdictional High Court. Union of India v. Alapan Bandyopadhyay, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 12 : AIR 2022 SC 499 : (2022) 3 SCC 133


    Tags
    Annual Digests 2022Supreme CourtAdministrative Law
    Next Story
    X
    sidekick
    x
    IP subscription is detected for  
    Please register yourself for unlimited free access.
    Redirecting to register page...