Tax
No Service Tax Payable On Interest Income On Overdraft/Cash Credit Facilities: Kolkata CESTAT
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has quashed the service tax demand on interest equivalent on overdraft or cash credit extended by cooperative banks.The bench of R. Muralidhar (Judicial Member) and Rajeev Tandon (Technical Member) has observed that Notification No. 29/2004-ST clearly exempts service tax on interest income on overdraft/cash...
Absence Of Incriminating Materials, AO Not Empowered To Reopen Assessments In Block Period Of Six Years: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that based on the material obtained during the search, the Assessing Officer, who gets the jurisdiction to re-open the assessments, can do so in respect of the individual assessment years comprised in the block period of six years only if the material obtained during the search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, or any part thereof, relates to the...
Slump Sale Doesn't Amount To Sale Of Goods Within MVAT Act: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that slump sale under the Business Transfer Agreement (BTA) would not amount to sale of goods within the purview of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (MVAT) Act.The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra Jain has observed that it was completely a flawed approach on the part of the reviewing authority to tax part of the BTA considering it to...
Revisionary Power Can't Be Invoked On Allegation Of Improper Inquiry By AO: Delhi ITAT
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the assessment order cannot be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue merely on the allegation that the Assessing Officer has not made an inquiry and verification with regard to cash deposits as well as scrap sales.The bench of Saktijit Dey (Vice President) and Naveen Chandra (Accountant Member)...
Non-Communication Of SCN To Call Book Is Fatal; Bombay High Court Quashes SCNs Against ICICI Home Finance
The Bombay High Court, while quashing the show cause notices against ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd., held that non-communication of show cause notices transferred to the call book is fatal.The bench of Justice K.R. Shriram and Justice Jitendra Jain observed that the reason why the show cause notices were transferred to the call book was because of the SLP pending in the Apex Court in...
53rd GST Council Meet Tomorrow: What's The Key Expectations?
About Eight and a half months after its previous meeting, the Center has decided to call a meeting of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council on June 22, 2024.Although the meeting's agenda is yet unknown, state finance ministers should bring forth ideas for an indirect tax system that might be included in the Union Budget, which is anticipated to be unveiled next month.Here are the...
Allahabad High Court Monthly Tax Digest: May 2024
NOMINAL INDEX Mr. Pranay Dhabhai v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 299 Mentha And Allied Products Ltd vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 300 Satish Kumar Bansal Huf v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Nafac And Another 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 301 M/S K Y Tobacco Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 319 M/S Rajshi...
Statutory Scheme Determining Taxable Turnover Of Works Contract Under KVAT Act Doesn't Suffer From Any Defect: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that the statutory scheme for determining the taxable turnover of a works contract under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act (KVAT Act) does not suffer from any defect so as to render it unworkable to effectuate the charge to tax on a works contract. The bench of Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice Syam Kumar V. M. has observed that it was incumbent upon...
Bombay High Court Upholds ITAT's Order Directing Vodafone India To Deposit Rs.230 Crores For Staying Income Tax Demand
The Bombay High Court has upheld the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directing Vodafone India to deposit Rs. 230 crores for staying income tax demand.The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan directed the petitioner, Vodafone India, to deposit an amount of Rs. 230 crore, being the lowest or minimum amount of 20% of the disputed tax...
ITC Wrongfully Availed But No Fraud/Misstatement Proven; Madras High Court Imposes Token Penalty
The Madras High Court has imposed a token penalty of Rs. 10,000 on the assessee instead of a higher penalty as the assessee wrongfully availed of the input tax credit (ITC), but the department could not prove fraud or misstatement on the part of the assessee.The bench of Justice C. Saravanan has observed that the assessee reversed the ITC. Penalties under Section 74 deal with situations...
Mark Engraved On Gold Coins Is House Mark And Not Brand Name, No Excise Duty Payable: Chennai CESTAT
The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that excise duty is not payable on the mark engraved on gold coins as it is just a house mark and not a brand name.The bench of Sulekha Beevi C. S. (Judicial Member) and Vasa Seshagiri Rao (Technical Member) has observed that a mark intended for identifying the manufacturer cannot be considered to be...
Olectra Greentech Eligible For DFIA Scheme Benefits On Imported Lithium Ion Battery For Agriculture Tractor Export: CESTAT
The Hyderabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the assessee, Olectra Greentech, is eligible for Duty-Free Import Authorization (DFIA) Scheme benefits on imported lithium-ion batteries for agriculture tractor export. The bench of Somesh Arora (Judicial Member) and A.K. Jyotishi (Technical Member) has observed that the lithium-ion battery...