Tax
Reassessment Notices & Order Passed Contrary To Notified Mandatory Faceless Procedure U/s 151A Are Liable To Be Quashed: Bombay HC
While observing that the Scheme notified by the Central Government does not envisage exclusion of provisions of Section 148A as the procedure outlined within the said provisions are inextricably linked to Section 148, the Bombay High Court quashed the entire exercise undertaken by the Jurisdiction AO u/s 148A outside the faceless mechanism. Section 148A of the Income Tax Act states...
ITAT Weekly Round-Up: 4 To 10 August 2024
Contribution Towards NPS Made Prior To Filing Of Return: ITAT Deletes AdditionCase Title: Adani Petronet Versus AOThe Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition of employees contribution towards the National Pension System (NPS) as the contribution towards NPS made prior to filing of the return.Additions U/s 69C On Account Of Excess Stock Can't Be...
CESTAT Weekly Round-Up: 4 To 10 August 2024
ACD Refund Claim Can't Be Rejected For Non-Mentioning Of Period Particulars In CA Certificate: CESTATCase Title: M/s. Jumar Trade Links Versus Commissioner of Customs (Exports)The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the Additional Duty of Customs (ADC) refund claim cannot be rejected for mere non-mentioning of period particulars in the...
Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: 4 To 10 August 2024
Delhi High CourtAmendment In Section 153C Income Tax Act Can't Be Interpreted For Revival Of Already Time Barred Proceedings: Delhi High CourtCase Title: PCIT Versus Karina Airlines International Ltd.The Delhi High Court has held that the power to assess the block period of ten years would clearly not be attracted in the case of a search that had taken place prior to April 1,...
Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: 4 To 10 August 2024
Bombay High CourtNot Mandatory For Assessment Order To Contain Reference Disclosing Its Satisfaction Of Each And Every Query: Bombay High CourtCase Title: Hemant Surgical Industries Ltd. Versus Union of IndiaThe Bombay High Court has held that it is not mandatory for assessment orders to contain reference and/or discussion to disclose its satisfaction in respect of each and every...
ITAT Declines To Stay Cancellation Of Exemption Notification To Legal Initiative For Forest And Environment Trust (LIFE)
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the stay application filed by assessee-LIFE Trust against the withdrawal/cancellation of registration for exemption granted under section 12A/12AA/12AB from FY 2013-14 onwards. The registration was cancelled on account of activities of the trust being determined to be non-genuine and not in accordance with the objects of...
No Service Tax Payable On Laying Down Water Supply Pipelines For Govt.: CESTAT
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the assessee is not liable to pay service tax for the activity undertaken by them for laying down the pipelines for government/government undertakings for supply of water from KWA in Thiruvananthapuram City. The bench of Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) and K. Anpazhakan (Technical Member) has...
Settlement Commission's Order Accepting Explanation 'In The Spirit Of Settlement' Doesn't Require Interference: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court has held that the Settlement Commission, by accepting the explanation 'in the spirit of settlement', cannot be faulted for calling for interference in exercise of the limited jurisdiction.The bench of Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav has observed that the Settlement Commission has taken note of the declaration made under Rule 8 of the Income Tax Settlement...
Purchaser Can't Be Punished For Failure Of Seller To Deposit Tax: Gauhati High Court
The Gauhati High Court has held that a purchasing dealer cannot be punished for the act of the selling dealer in case the selling dealer had failed to deposit the tax collected by it.The bench of Chief Justice Vijay Bishnoi and Justice Suman Shyam has observed that the Department is precluded from invoking Section 9(2)(g) of the DVAT to deny ITC to a purchasing dealer who has bona fide...
Composite Contracts Can't Be Taxed Under “Erection, Commissioning And Installation Services”: CESTAT
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has observed that composite contracts involving supply of both goods and services could not have been taxed under the category “Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Services.”.The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that the taxable...
Uploading Assessemnt Orders After GST Registration Cancellation, Petitioner Failed To Check Website, Kerala High Court Grants Opportunity To Challenge On Deposit
The Kerala High Court has quashed the assessment orders and remanded the matter back on condition of remitting Rs. 10 lakhs towards the GST liabilities.The bench of Justice Gopinath P. has observed that the registration of the petitioner had been cancelled in the month of December 2021, and the petitioner had also stopped business. The assessment orders were issued only in the month of...
Settlement Consideration Liable To Be Recognized As “Capital Gains” And Not “Profits In Lieu Of Salary”: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that the settlement consideration is liable to be recognized as capital gains and not “profits in lieu of salary.”.The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Ravinder Dudeja has observed that the fundamental mistake which the Tribunal committed was failing to bear in mind the distinction between a “perquisite” and “profits in lieu of salary," both...