Bilkis Banu Case-Supreme Court Judgement On Petitions Against Remission Of 11 Convicts-LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

8 Jan 2024 10:05 AM IST

  • Bilkis Banu Case-Supreme Court Judgement  On  Petitions Against Remission Of 11 Convicts-LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court bench headed by Justice BV Nagarathna will pronounce the judgement TODAY on petitions challenging the remission of 11 convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for multiple murders and gang rapes, including that of Bilkis Bano, during the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat. These convicts were allowed to walk free in August 2022, on Independence Day, sparking widespread controversy...

    Supreme Court bench headed by Justice BV Nagarathna  will  pronounce the judgement TODAY on  petitions challenging the remission of 11 convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for multiple murders and gang rapes, including that of Bilkis Bano, during the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat. These convicts were allowed to walk free in August 2022, on Independence Day, sparking widespread controversy and leading to constitutional challenges before the top court.

    After an 11-day-long hearing that began in August, a division bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan reserved its judgment on October 12. Besides this, the court also directed the Gujarat and union governments to submit original records available with them.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:59 AM IST

      SC : Judgment of this Court of May 13, 2022 is hit by fruad and a nullity..

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:58 AM IST

      #BREAKING #SupremeCourt holds that the judgment of May 13, 2022 (which directed the Gujarat Govt to consider remission) is a nullity as it was obtained by "playing fraud on the Court" and by suppressing material facts.

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:55 AM IST

      Justice Nagarathna: The judgment of May 13, 2022 held that State of Gujarat and not the State of Maharashtra was the appropriate govt to consider remission. This is contrary to the Constitution Bench judgment in Sriharan case.

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:54 AM IST

      Justice Nagarthna : By suppressing material facts and making misleading facts, a direction was sought by the convict to the State of Gujarat to consider remission.

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:54 AM IST

      Justice Nagarathna : The writ petition (in which direction to Gujarat Govt to consider remission) was filed by the convict by suppressing relevant facts, he also made misleading statements. The earlier judgment of Bombay HC, opinion of presiding judge was not revealed. #SupremeCourt #BilkisBano

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:47 AM IST

      Justice Nagarathna : On this ground alone (that Gujarat Govt lacked competence), the writ petitions are liable to be allowed and the orders are liable to be declared as nullity. But the matter does not end there. Reliance was placed on earlier judgment which directed Gujarat Govt to consider.

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:46 AM IST

      Justice Nagarthan : It is not the Govt of the State where the offence took place or the offenders are imprisoned which is the appropriate govt for remission.

      #BREAKING #SupremeCourt holds that State of Gujarat was not competent to pass the remission orders.

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:45 AM IST

      Justice Nagarthana : Govt of the State where the offender is sentenced is the appropriate government to grant remission, not the govt of the state where the offence took place.

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:44 AM IST

      Justice Nagarthna : Place of occurrence of crime and place of imprisonment not relevant considerations. Intention of Parliament is to hold that Govt where the offender is tried and sentenced is the appropriate govt. Emphasis is on place of trial rather than place where offence is committed.

    • 8 Jan 2024 10:40 AM IST

      Justice Nagarthna refers to concept of compassion.

    Next Story