Supreme court
Teesta Setalvad Case : ASG To Inform Supreme Court If Anything Substantial Survives In The Matter
The Supreme Court, on Thursday, adjourned the hearing in a batch of pleas filed by Teesta Setalvad in relation to three FIRs lodged against the couple over alleged embezzlement of funds raised for victims of 2002 Gujarat riots.The Additional Solicitor General, Mr. S.V. Raju apprised a Bench comprising Justice SK Kaul, Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice Aravind Kumar that Teesta...
Supreme Court Acquits Man Accused Of Taking Rs 300 Bribe Twenty Years Ago
The Supreme Court on Thursday acquitted a man who was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 for accepting a bribe of Rupees 300 in the year 2003.The convict, who was working as a cleaner, was accused to taking bribe for supplying a copy of the death certificate to the complainant. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal against the concurrent findings of the trial court and...
Carrot-and-Stick Policy Of Extending ED Director's Tenure By One Year At A Time Threatens Independence : Petitioners Tell Supreme Court
The carrot-and-stick policy of granting piecemeal extensions of only one year at a time to chiefs of investigating agencies threatened the independence of the institutions since the heads would either be perceived to have or would actually be compelled to compromise their duties towards the end of their tenure to secure an extension, Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan told the...
Supreme Court Urges Union To Play A Proactive Role To Resolve Sutlej-Yamuna Canal Dispute Between Punjab & Haryana
The Supreme Court, on Thursday, asked the Union Government to play a proactive role in the endeavour made by the neighbouring States of Punjab and Haryana to find workable solutions in relation to the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal dispute. A three-judge bench comprising Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, and Justice Aravind Kumar was hearing an original suit filed...
IBC- Once Resolution Plan Is Approved, No Modifications Are Permissible : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that the declaration made by the NCLT to the effect that the trademarks “Deccan Chronicle” and “Andhra Bhoomi”, which originally belonged to Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (“DCHL/Corporate Debtor”), continues to be under the ownership of DCHL post the approval of resolution plan, would amount to impermissible modification of resolution plan as the same...
Advocate Making Baseless Allegation That Another Lawyer Took Money In Judge's Name; Supreme Court Affirms Contempt Of Court Proceedings
Taking a lenient view in an appeal filed by an advocate who was punished for contempt of Court, the Supreme Court reduced the penalty amount from Rs. 2 Lakhs to Rs. 1 Lakh.However, the Bench comprising of Justice Surya Kant and Justice J.K. Maheshwari upheld sentence for contempt of court against the advocate who raised frivolous allegations against another advocate that the latter was asking...
Supreme Court Asks Centre To File Response In Plea To Protect Western Ghats
Recently the Supreme Court bench comprising CJI D.Y Chandrachud, Justice P.S Narasimha, and Justice J.B Pardiwala passed an order directing the Central government to file a counter affidavit within four weeks in the matter concerning the protection of the Western Ghats.The matter will be next posted on July 25, 2023.About the case In 2019, a writ petition was filed by several individuals...
Service Of Employees In Zilla Parishad Should Be Counted For Seniority When ZP Has Been Absorbed By Municipal Corporation : Supreme Court
While hearing a plea against the primary teachers who were appointed in the Zila Parishad and were later on absorbed into Pune Municipal Corporation based on their inter-se seniority, the Supreme Court observed that their service, while in the Zilla Parishad, deserves to be counted for their seniority.A Division Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice J.K. Maheshwari observed that this...
Subletting By Tenant Impermissible Under Bombay Rent Control Act Unless Contract Allows It : Supreme Court
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court reiterated that it won’t be lawful to sublet after the enactment of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 unless the contract itself expressly provides so.“The aforestated provisions make it crystal clear that, in the ordinary course and notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, unless the contract itself...
Witness Went To Sleep After Seeing His Friend Murdered? Supreme Court Doubts Testimony, Acquits Convict In Murder Case After Two Decades
The Supreme Court recently set aside the conviction in a murder case after noting several blemishes in the testimony of the sole eyewitness.A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai, Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol was deciding an appeal filed by one Narendrasinh Keshubhai Zala who was sentenced to life by a trial court in Gujarat in 2003 for the murder of one Ram. After the Gujarat High Court...
LiveLaw Brings To You Special Holi Offer: Get 3 Years Premium subscription At INR 3600 + GST And Get 6 Months Subscription Free!
Avail LiveLaw's Special Holi Offer Buy Three Year Subscription For Just INR 3,600 +GST And Get 50% Discount + 6 Months Subscription Free Limited time offer ! Subscribe Now! Visit: livelaw.in/pricing Subscribe to LiveLaw Premium and get access to the following benefits: 1. Unlimited access to our archives, orders, etc. 2. Free copies of judgments with an option...
Surat Court Convicts Rahul Gandhi In Defamation Case Over 'Modi Surname' Remark, Gets 2-Year Jail Term
A Court in Gujarat's Surat District today convicted Congress leader and MP Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case for his remarks “why all thieves share the Modi surname” made during a political campaign in Karol in April 2019.BREAKING: Surat Court Convicts Rahul Gandhi In Defamation Case Over 'Modi Surname' Remark @RahulGandhi #SuratCourt #RahulGandhi #ModiSurnameremark...