UP RERA Introduces Standard Format for Written Arguments

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) has prepared a standard format for written arguments to ensure the speedy resolution of ongoing cases at its headquarters and regional offices. This format requires the complainant to provide a complete description of their property, the sale agreement, payments made to the promoter, their complaint, and the requested relief in writing before the RERA bench.

Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Builder Fails To Provide Monthly Returns On Booked Unit, Haryana RERA Orders Refund To Complainant

Case – Reena Devi & another Versus M/s Landmark Apartments Private Limited

Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), has directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the complainant for a unit in the commercial real estate project named Landmark Cyber Park, after the builder failed to pay the monthly return of Rs. 46,000.

Haryana RERA Orders Builder BPTP To Pay Interest And Pass Benefit of Increased Super Built-Up Area To Homebuyer

Case – Lalit Kumar Versus BPTP Ltd.

Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), has directed the builder to pay interest for the delay in handing over possession and pass on the benefit of the increased super built-up area to the homebuyer without imposing additional costs in the total sale consideration.

No Misrepresentation By Godrej Developers, Haryana RERA Refuses To Provide Refund Of Booking Amount To Homebuyer

Case – Neeraj Singh Bhadouria & another Versus M/s Godrej Developers and Promoters LLP

Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), dismissed the homebuyer's allegation that Godrej Developers misrepresented their joint venture project as solely developed and marketed by them. Additionally, the Authority refused to refund the booking amount to the homebuyer.

Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Punjab RERA Orders Builder To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Delayed Possession In The LAKE Project

Case – Ashok Kumar and another Versus M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developments Pvt. Ltd.

Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench consisting of Malwinder Singh Jaggi (Member), has directed the builder to pay interest to the homebuyer for the delay in handing over possession of the flat in a construction linked plan real estate project.

Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Builder Failed To Commence Construction Even After Two Years From Agreement Date, Karnataka RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyer

Case – Dabasish Gayen Versus GVG Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and others

Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer for a flat, as the builder failed to start construction of the project even after two years from the date of entering into the agreement for sale with the homebuyer.

Karnataka RERA Orders Builder To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Delayed Possession In GM Global Techies Town Project

Case – Sudipta Majumder Versus M/S Gulam Mustafa Enterprises Pvt. Ltd

Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed the builder to pay nine lakh rupees to the homebuyer as interest for the delay in handing over possession of the flat in the GM Global Techies Town Tower C Project.

Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority

MahaRERA – Dispute Arising Out Of Development Agreement Is Not Maintainable

Case - Pulin Co-Operative Housing Society Limited Versus Tirupati Developers

Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Mahesh Pathak (Member), held that there is no provision in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, which empowers the authority to entertain disputes arising out of a development agreement, such disputes fall under the jurisdiction of the Civil court. Consequently, the authority dismissed the complaint of the Housing society/Complainant.

MahaRERA Grants 4-Year Extension To RSM Homes To Complete Their Unimont Coral Project

Citation - REGULATORY CASE NO. 225 OF 2024

Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising of Ajoy Mehta (Chairperson), granted a 4-year extension to RSM Homes LLP Ltd for its Project Unimont Coral under Section 7(3) of the RERA 2016. In total, this is the fourth extension of the project, the other three extensions were granted by authority on the grounds of Covid-19 under Section 6 of RERA 2016.

Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Tamil Nadu RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyer And Imposes Penalty On Builder For Selling Unregistered Project

Case – V. Saravanan Versus M/s. Spring Field Shelters (P) Ltd.

Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sunil Kumar (Member), directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer to purchase the two villas. Additionally, the Authority imposed a penalty on the builder for marketing, advertising, and selling the unregistered project to the homebuyer.